Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36868174›Full record

ArticleGaceta sanitaria2023

[Primary care pathways and locations during the pandemic in a rural area of Alicante].

Lucía Pérez-Fernández, Francisco Miguel Escandell-Rico, María Teresa Ruiz-Cantero

Abstract readCase ReportsEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gaceta sanitaria, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucía Pérez-FernándezCentro de Salud de Almoradí, Departamento de Salud 21, Orihuela (Alicante), España.
Francisco Miguel Escandell-RicoDepartamento de Enfermería, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, España. Electronic address: francisco.escandell@ua.es.
María Teresa Ruiz-CanteroGrupo de Investigación de Salud Pública, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, España; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes the means of health care used in a primary health care centre (PHCC) in a rural area to care for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. After conducting a cross-sectional study using health questionnaire with 243 patients (100 COVID-19 and 143 other pathologies), we observed that general medical care was 100% by telephone, and little use was made of the portal for citizen information and appointment requests of the Conselleria de Sanitat de la Comunidad Valenciana. Nursing attended 100% by telephone, as did the PHCC doctors and the PHCC emergencies; in the case of taking samples, blood samples and wound care it was face-to-face (men 91%, women 88%), and at home (9% and 12%). In conclusion, different care patterns are observed according to the PHCC professionals, and the need to improve the online pathway with care management.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCritical PathwaysCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleAsistencia sanitariaCOVID-19GenderGéneroHealthcareInformation technologiesSexSexoTecnologías de la información

Identifiers

PMID36868174
PMCPMC9975789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.