Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36867991›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2023

Measuring disadvantage: A systematic comparison of United States small-area disadvantage indices.

Sophia Lou, Salvatore Giorgi, Tingting Liu, Johannes C Eichstaedt, Brenda Curtis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Use of the Child Opportunity Index in Adolescent and Young Adult Health Research.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neighborhood Determinants of Health as a Composite Index: Comparing Area-Based Indices in Public Health Research.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sophia LouTechnology and Translational Research Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 251 Bayview Blvd., Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Salvatore GiorgiTechnology and Translational Research Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 251 Bayview Blvd., Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA; Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 3330 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Tingting LiuTechnology and Translational Research Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 251 Bayview Blvd., Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA; Positive Psychology Center, Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 425 S. University Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Johannes C EichstaedtDepartment of Psychology and Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University, 210 Panama St., Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Brenda CurtisTechnology and Translational Research Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 251 Bayview Blvd., Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. Electronic address: brenda.curtis@nih.gov.

Funding

Digital Markers in Relapse and RecoveryZIADA000628 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI CURTIS, BRENDA · 2019 to 2025
$10.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive evidence demonstrates the effects of area-based disadvantage on a variety of life outcomes, such as increased mortality and low economic mobility. Despite these well-established patterns, disadvantage, often measured using composite indices, is inconsistently operationalized across studies. To address this issue, we systematically compared 5 U.S. disadvantage indices at the county-level on their relationships to 24 diverse life outcomes related to mortality, physical health, mental health, subjective well-being, and social capital from heterogeneous data sources. We further examined which domains of disadvantage are most important when creating these indices. Of the five indices examined, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Child Opportunity Index 2.0 (COI) were most related to a diverse set of life outcomes, particularly physical health. Within each index, variables from the domains of education and employment were most important in relationships with life outcomes. Disadvantage indices are being used in real-world policy and resource allocation decisions; an index's generalizability across diverse life outcomes, and the domains of disadvantage which constitute the index, should be considered when guiding such decisions.

Indexed as

EmploymentMental HealthChildEducational StatusHumansUnited StatesDeprivationDisadvantageMortalitySocial capitalVulnerability

Identifiers

PMID36867991
PMCPMC10038931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.