ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023
The timing and amplitude of the muscular activity of the arms preceding impact in a forward fall is modulated with fall velocity.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Protective arm reactions have been shown to be an important injury avoidance mechanism in unavoidable falls. Protective arm reactions have been shown to be modulated with fall height, however it is not clear if they are modulated with impact velocity. The aim of this study was to determine if protective arm reactions are modulated in response to a forward fall with an initially unpredictable impact velocity. Forward falls were evoked via sudden release of a standing pendulum support frame with adjustable counterweight to control fall acceleration and impact velocity. Thirteen younger adults (1 female) participated in this study. Counterweight load explained more than 89% of the variation of impact velocity. Angular velocity at impact decreased (p < 0.001), drop duration increased from 601 ms to 816 ms (p < 0.001), and the maximum vertical ground reaction force decreased from 64%BW to 46%BW (p < 0.001) between the small and large counterweight. Elbow angle at impact (129 degrees extension), triceps (119 ms) and biceps (98 ms) pre-impact time, and co-activation (57%) were not significantly affected by counterweight load (p-values > 0.08). Average triceps and biceps EMG amplitude decreased from 0.26 V/V to 0.19 V/V (p = 0.004) and 0.24 V/V to 0.11 V/V (p = 0.002) with increasing counterweight respectively. Protective arm reactions were modulated with fall velocity by reducing EMG amplitude with decreasing impact velocity. This demonstrates a neuromotor control strategy for managing evolving fall conditions. Future work is needed to further understand how the CNS deals with additional unpredictability (e.g., fall direction, perturbation magnitude, etc.) when deploying protective arm reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.