Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36867701›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

The dogs of Chernobyl: Demographic insights into populations inhabiting the nuclear exclusion zone.

Gabriella J Spatola, Reuben M Buckley, Megan Dillon, Emily V Dutrow, Jennifer A Betz, Małgorzata Pilot, Heidi G Parker, Wiesław Bogdanowicz, Rachel Thomas, Ihor Chyzhevskyi and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A 120-y time series of genomes reveals the consequences of closed breeding in German Shepherd Dogs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Mating system of free-ranging domestic dogs and its consequences for dog evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Trends of Eurasian Perch (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Gabriella J SpatolaNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7889-3425
Reuben M BuckleyNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6334-3906
Megan DillonNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9364-2528
Emily V DutrowNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9113-8528
Jennifer A BetzClean Futures Fund+, Godfrey, IL 62035, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2889-331X
Małgorzata PilotMuseum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Heidi G ParkerNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9707-6380
Wiesław BogdanowiczMuseum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1196-2494
Rachel ThomasNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3029-8798
Ihor ChyzhevskyiState Specialized Enterprise "Ecocentre", Chornobyl, Ukraine.
Gennadi MilinevskyTaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-2342-2615
Norman KleimanColumbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4725-998X
Matthew BreenNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh NC 27695, USA.
Elaine A OstranderNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-9738
Timothy A MousseauDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2235-4868
National Institutes of Health · USNorth Carolina State University · USMuseum and Institute of Zoology · PLColumbia University · USFutures Group (United States) · USMinistry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine · UATaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv · UAUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

Comparative Mammalian GenomicsZIAHG200377 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI OSTRANDER, ELAINE · 2012 to 2025
$24.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster initiated a series of catastrophic events resulting in long-term and widespread environmental contamination. We characterize the genetic structure of 302 dogs representing three free-roaming dog populations living within the power plant itself, as well as those 15 to 45 kilometers from the disaster site. Genome-wide profiles from Chernobyl, purebred and free-breeding dogs, worldwide reveal that the individuals from the power plant and Chernobyl City are genetically distinct, with the former displaying increased intrapopulation genetic similarity and differentiation. Analysis of shared ancestral genome segments highlights differences in the extent and timing of western breed introgression. Kinship analysis reveals 15 families, with the largest spanning all collection sites within the radioactive exclusion zone, reflecting migration of dogs between the power plant and Chernobyl City. This study presents the first characterization of a domestic species in Chernobyl, establishing their importance for genetic studies into the effects of exposure to long-term, low-dose ionizing radiation.

Indexed as

Chernobyl Nuclear AccidentDisastersAnimalsDemographyDogsEnvironmentEnvironmental Pollution

Identifiers

PMID36867701
PMCPMC9984172
OpenAlexW4323031640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.