Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36867682›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Perceptions and Use of Telehealth Among Diverse Communities: Multisite Community-Engaged Mixed Methods Study.

Amelia Barwise, Todd Huschka, Cecelia Woo, Jason Egginton, Lily Huang, Jay-Sheree Allen, Matthew Johnson, Kathryn Hamm, Wendy Wolfersteig, Sean Phelan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Improved outcomes for depressed elder abuse victims with video-delivered psychotherapy during COVID-19.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amelia BarwiseProgram in Biomedical Ethics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9267-1298
Todd HuschkaRobert D and Patricia E Kern Center for Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0318-918X
Cecelia WooDavidson College, Davidson, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1210-5569
Jason EggintonRobert D and Patricia E Kern Center for Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4026-6957
Lily HuangQuantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3713-3443
Jay-Sheree AllenDepartment of Family Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1923-1234
Matthew JohnsonDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3361-0668
Kathryn HammOffice of Evaluation and Partner Contracts, Southwest Interdisciplinary Research Center, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5167-0432
Wendy WolfersteigOffice of Evaluation and Partner Contracts, Southwest Interdisciplinary Research Center, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5451-6825
Sean Phelan *Robert D and Patricia E Kern Center for Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2091-6297
Megan Allyse *Program in Biomedical Ethics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6136-9256
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USArizona State University · USMayo Clinic · USDavidson College · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Minnesota Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelehealth has been increasingly adopted by health care systems since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although telehealth may provide convenience for patients and clinicians, there are several barriers to accessing it and using it effectively to provide high-quality patient care.

objectiveThis study was part of a larger multisite community-engaged study conducted to understand the impact of COVID-19 on diverse communities. The work described here explored the perceptions of and experience with telehealth use among diverse and underserved community members during COVID-19.

methodsWe used mixed methods across three regions in the United States (Midwest, Arizona, and Florida) from January to November 2021. We promoted our study through social media and community partnerships, disseminating flyers in English and Spanish. We developed a moderator guide and conducted focus groups in English and Spanish, mostly using a videoconferencing platform. Participants were placed in focus groups with others who shared similar demographic attributes and geographic location. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. We analyzed our qualitative data using the framework analytic approach. We developed our broader survey using validated scales and with input from community and scientific leaders, which was then distributed through social media in both English and Spanish. We included a previously published questionnaire that had been used to assess perceptions about telehealth among patients with HIV. We analyzed our quantitative data using SAS software and standard statistical approaches. We examined the effect of region, age, ethnicity/race, and education on the use and perceptions of telehealth.

resultsWe included data from 47 focus groups. Owing to our mode of dissemination, we were not able to calculate a response rate for the survey. However, we received 3447 English-language and 146 Spanish-language responses. Over 90% of participants had internet access and 94% had used telehealth. Approximately half of all participants agreed or strongly agreed that telehealth would be beneficial in the future because it better fit their schedules and they would not need to travel. However, approximately half of the participants also agreed or strongly agreed they would not be able to express themselves well and could not be examined when using telehealth. Indigenous participants were especially concerned about these issues when compared to other racial groups.

conclusionsThis work describes findings from a mixed methods community-engaged research study about telehealth, including perceived benefits and concerns. Although participants enjoyed the benefits of telehealth (eg, not having to travel and easier scheduling), they also had concerns (eg, not being able to express themselves well and not having a physical exam) about telehealth. These sentiments were especially notable among the Indigenous population. Our work highlights the importance of fully understanding the impact of these novel health delivery modalities on the patient experience and actual or perceived quality of care received.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineDelivery of Health CareEthnicityHumansPandemicsUnited Statescommunity-based researchcommunity healthCOVID-19digital healthhealth care systemhealth deliverymixed methods researchpatient experiencequality of caretelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36867682
PMCPMC10057900
OpenAlexW4318825828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.