Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36867259›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2023

Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature.

Francesco Bosco, Giorgio Cacciola, Fortunato Giustra, Salvatore Risitano, Marcello Capella, Daniele Vezza, Luca Barberis, Pietro Cavaliere, Alessandro Massè, Luigi Sabatini

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Use of a Bioresorbable Antibacterial Coating (DACAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Early and delayed periprosthetic joint infection in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  10. Dalbavancin as suppressive therapy for implant-related infections: a case series with therapeutic drug monitoring and review of the literature.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco BoscoCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Giorgio CacciolaCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Fortunato GiustraCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy. fortunato.giustra@edu.unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-2933
Salvatore RisitanoCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Marcello CapellaCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Daniele VezzaCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Luca BarberisCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Pietro CavaliereIstituto Ortopedico del Mezzogiorno d'Italia "Franco Scalabrino", 98100, Messina, Via Consolare Pompea, Italy.
Alessandro MassèCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Luigi SabatiniCentro Traumatologico Ortopedico (CTO), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti, 29, 10126, Turin, Italy.
CTO Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee represents a severe complication after 1.5% to 2% of primary total knee replacement. Although two-stage revision was considered the gold-standard treatment for PJI of the knee, in the last decades, more studies reported the outcomes of one-stage revisions. This systematic review aims to assess reinfection rate, infection-free survival after reoperation for recurrent infection, and the microorganisms involved in both primary and recurrent infection. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic review of all studies reporting the outcome of one-stage revision for PJI of the knee up to September 2022, according to PRISMA criteria and AMSTAR2 guidelines, was performed. Patient demographics, clinical, surgical, and postoperative data were recorded. PROSPERO ID: CRD42022362767.

resultsEighteen studies with a total of 881 one-stage revisions for PJI of the knee were analyzed. A reinfection rate of 12.2% after an average follow-up of 57.6 months was reported. The most frequent causative microorganism were gram-positive bacteria (71.1%), gram-negative bacteria (7.1%), and polymicrobial infections (8%). The average postoperative knee society score was 81.5, and the average postoperative knee function score was 74.2. The infection-free survival after treatment for recurrent infection was 92.1%. The causative microorganisms at reinfections differed significantly from the primary infection (gram-positive 44.4%, gram-negative 11.1%).

conclusionPatients who underwent a one-stage revision for PJI of the knee showed a reinfection rate lower or comparable to other surgical treatments as two-stage or DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention). Reoperation for reinfection demonstrates a lower success compared to one-stage revision. Moreover, microbiology differs between primary infection and recurrent infection. Level of evidence Level IV.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousProsthesis-Related InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDebridementHumansKnee JointReinfectionReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsOne-stagePeriprosthetic joint infectionPJITKATKRTotal knee arthroplastyTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID36867259
PMCPMC10504163
OpenAlexW4323036269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.