ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2023
Toward the future of OECD/ISO biodegradability testing-new approaches and developments.
Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial degradation of aromatic ester pollutants in agro-ecosystems: implications for bioremediation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Influence of temperature and inoculum composition on standardized biodegradation tests of bioplastics in freshwater under aerobic conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microbial Biodegradation of Chlorothalonil Residual Pollutants in Soil and Tomato Plants by MicroencapsulatedToxics · 2026Article
- Persistence Assessment of Chemicals: Trajectories toward New Approach Methodologies (P-NAMs).Environmental science & technology · 2026Review
- Renewable Feedstock Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery: Evidence Mapping and Translational Readiness.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Testing the biodegradability of difficult compounds: a future challenge for the OECD/ISO standardization.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Effects of Channel Characteristics on Wastewater Chemical Transformation in Rivers.Water, air, and soil pollution · 2026Article
- A novel manometric test to assess inherent biodegradability of complex and non-soluble chemicals.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Advances and Challenges in Microbial Immobilization Technology for Organic Contaminated Soil Remediation.Toxics · 2025Review
- The overlooked role of manganese in biodegradation studies of higher aminopolyphosphonates.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025Article
- Enhancing Biodegradation of Poly(lactic acid) in Compost at Room Temperature by Compounding Jade Particles.Polymers · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of in vitro skin permeation and accumulation of phenolic acids from honey and honey-based pharmaceutical formulations.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Effect of microplastic on sorption, toxicity, and mineralization of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid ionic liquids.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Article
- Biodegradation of the Antiretroviral Tenofovir Disoproxil by a Cyanobacteria/Bacterial Culture.Toxics · 2024Article
- Wheat Bran and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Biomass' Effect on Aerobic and Anaerobic Degradation Efficiency of Paper Composite.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Microbiological toxicity tests using standardized ISO/OECD methods-current state and outlook.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Biodegradation of Water-Soluble Polymers by Wastewater Microorganisms: Challenging Laboratory Testing Protocols.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Current Challenges in Microcapsule Designs and Microencapsulation Processes: A Review.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past decades, industrial and scientific communities have developed a complex standardized system (e.g., OECD, ISO, CEN) to evaluate the biodegradability of chemical substances. This system includes for OECD three levels of testing (ready and inherent biodegradability tests, simulation tests). It was adopted by many countries and is completely integrated into European legislation (registration, evaluation, authorization, and restriction of chemicals, REACH). Nevertheless, the different tests have certain deficiencies, and the question arises of how accurately these tests display the situation in the real environment and how the results can be used for predictions. This review will focus on the technical advantages and weaknesses of current tests concerning the technical setup, the inoculum characterization, and its biodegradation potential as well as the use of adequate reference compounds. A special focus of the article will be on combined test systems offering enhanced possibilities to predict biodegradation. The properties of microbial inocula are critically discussed, and a new concept concerning the biodegradation adaptation potential (BAP) of inocula is proposed. Furthermore, a probability model and different in silico QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationships) models to predict biodegradation from chemical structures are reviewed. Another focus lies on the biodegradation of difficult single compounds and mixtures of chemicals like UVCBs (unknown or variable composition, complex reaction products, or biological materials) which will be an important challenge for the forthcoming decades. KEY POINTS: • There are many technical points to be improved in OECD/ISO biodegradation tests • The proper characterization of inocula is a crucial point in biodegradation tests • Combined biodegradation test systems offer extended possibilities for biodegradation tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.