Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36866838›Full record

Trial reportCancer medicine2023

Isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A phase 1/2 study.

Alexander Lesokhin, Richard LeBlanc, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Marcelo Capra, Carmelo Carlo-Stella, Lionel Karlin, Jean-Francois Castilloux, Peter Forsberg, Gurdeep Parmar, Axel Tosikyan and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03194867 (A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Isatuximab in Combination With Cemiplimab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03194867 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Isatuximab in Combination With Cemiplimab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2018 to 2023Enrolled109ConditionsPlasma Cell MyelomaArmsIsatuximab SAR650984, Cemiplimab REGN2810
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma: Current Status as Prologue to the Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 18 institutions in 9 countries.

Alexander LesokhinMyeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9321-702X
Richard LeBlancDivision of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qubec, Canada.
Meletios A DimopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Marcelo CapraCentro Integrado de Hematologia e Oncologia, Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Carmelo Carlo-StellaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano-Milan, Italy.
Lionel KarlinDepartment of Hematology, Hôpital Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Jean-Francois CastillouxCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Peter ForsbergDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Gurdeep ParmarDepartment of Haematology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Axel TosikyanHôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Qubec, Canada.
Ludek PourDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Vincent RibragDepartment of Hematology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Rossella RibollaDepartment of Hematology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Al-Ola AbdallahDivision of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Nadia Le RouxSanofi Research & Development on behalf of Altran, Vitry-sur-Seine, France.
Liyan DongSanofi, Beijing, China.
Helgi van de VeldeSanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Laurent MayrargueSanofi Research & Development, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
Lucie LépineSanofi Clinical Pharmacokinetics on behalf of Excelya, Chilly-Mazarin, France.
Sandrine MacéSanofi Research & Development, Vitry-sur-Seine, France.
Philippe MoreauHematology Department, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1780-8746
Sanofi (France) · FRAltran (France) · FRAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CAHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CAHospital Mãe de Deus · BRHumanitas University · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSanofi (China) · CNSanofi (United States) · USUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity Hospital Brno · CZUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Kansas · USWollongong Hospital · AU

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the incurable nature of multiple myeloma (MM), efforts are made to improve the efficacy of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies via combinations with other potentially synergistic therapies. This Phase 1/2 trial (NCT03194867) was designed to determine whether cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) enhances the anti-myeloma activity of isatuximab (anti-CD38) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), to confirm the feasibility of the combination, determine its efficacy, and further evaluate its safety.

methodsPatients received isatuximab 10 mg/kg once weekly for 4 weeks followed by every 2 weeks (Isa), or isatuximab 10 mg/kg plus cemiplimab 250 mg every 2 (Isa + CemiQ2W) or every 4 weeks (Isa + CemiQ4W).

resultsOverall, 106 patients with RRMM treated with a median of 4 prior lines were included; 25.5% had high-risk cytogenetics, 63.2% were refractory to proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents, 26.4% were previously exposed to daratumumab, and 84.0% were refractory to their last treatment line. There were no major changes in the safety or pharmacokinetic profile of isatuximab with the addition of cemiplimab. As assessed by investigators, four patients (11.8%) in the Isa arm, nine patients (25.0%) in the Isa + CemiQ2W arm, and eight patients (22.2%) in the Isa + CemiQ4W arm were responders. Though response rates were numerically higher in cemiplimab-containing arms, differences were not statistically significant and did not translate to improved progression-free or overall survival after a median follow-up of 9.99 months.

conclusionOur results suggest a marginal benefit by adding cemiplimab to isatuximab, despite demonstration of target engagement, without additional observed safety issues.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsMultiple MyelomaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDexamethasoneHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentscemiplimabDexamethasoneisatuximab

Identifiers

PMID36866838
PMCPMC10225222
OpenAlexW4323035289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.