Trial reportCancer medicine2023
Isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A phase 1/2 study.
Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03194867 (A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Isatuximab in Combination With Cemiplimab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1/2 Study to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Isatuximab in Combination With Cemiplimab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes associated with anti-CD38-based retreatment in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Isatuximab in combination with cemiplimab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A phase 1/2 study.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Decoding immunotherapy resistance in multiple myeloma: genetic insights and approaches to counter resistance.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Enhancing immunotherapy efficacy in multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: from combinatorial therapeutic approaches to gut microbiota modulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy in multiple myeloma: advances from immune microenvironment insights to clinical application.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Review
- Efficacy and safety of isatuximab monotherapy to treat relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Article
- Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma: Current Status as Prologue to the Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Opportunistic Infections and Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Administering Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 18 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGiven the incurable nature of multiple myeloma (MM), efforts are made to improve the efficacy of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies via combinations with other potentially synergistic therapies. This Phase 1/2 trial (NCT03194867) was designed to determine whether cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) enhances the anti-myeloma activity of isatuximab (anti-CD38) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), to confirm the feasibility of the combination, determine its efficacy, and further evaluate its safety.
methodsPatients received isatuximab 10 mg/kg once weekly for 4 weeks followed by every 2 weeks (Isa), or isatuximab 10 mg/kg plus cemiplimab 250 mg every 2 (Isa + CemiQ2W) or every 4 weeks (Isa + CemiQ4W).
resultsOverall, 106 patients with RRMM treated with a median of 4 prior lines were included; 25.5% had high-risk cytogenetics, 63.2% were refractory to proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents, 26.4% were previously exposed to daratumumab, and 84.0% were refractory to their last treatment line. There were no major changes in the safety or pharmacokinetic profile of isatuximab with the addition of cemiplimab. As assessed by investigators, four patients (11.8%) in the Isa arm, nine patients (25.0%) in the Isa + CemiQ2W arm, and eight patients (22.2%) in the Isa + CemiQ4W arm were responders. Though response rates were numerically higher in cemiplimab-containing arms, differences were not statistically significant and did not translate to improved progression-free or overall survival after a median follow-up of 9.99 months.
conclusionOur results suggest a marginal benefit by adding cemiplimab to isatuximab, despite demonstration of target engagement, without additional observed safety issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.