Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36866493›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2023

A qualitative improvement program for minimally invasive mitral surgery: technical advancements ameliorate outcome and operative times.

Can Gollmann-Tepeköylü, Felix Nägele, Daniel Höfer, Johannes Holfeld, Jakob Hirsch, Cenk Ulvi Oezpeker, Elfriede Ruttmann-Ulmer, Juliane Kilo, Herbert Hangler, Ludwig Müller and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Silent Cost of Gender in Mitral Valve Surgery: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Five-year outcomes of different techniques for minimally invasive mitral valve repair in Barlow's disease.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Can Gollmann-TepeköylüDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Felix NägeleDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Daniel HöferDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Johannes HolfeldDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6623-0595
Jakob HirschDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4747-7802
Cenk Ulvi OezpekerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elfriede Ruttmann-UlmerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Juliane KiloDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Herbert HanglerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ludwig MüllerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael GrimmDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Nikolaos BonarosDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7656-5812

Funding

Department of Cardiac SurgeryMedical University of Innsbruck
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMinimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has evolved over the last 2 decades. The aim of the study was to identify the impact of era and technical improvements on perioperative outcome after MIMVS.

methodsA tota of 1000 patients (mean age: 60.8 ± 12.7 years, 60.3% male) underwent video-assisted or totally endoscopic MIMVS between 2001 and 2020 in a single institution. Three technical modalities were introduced during the observed period: (i) 3D visualization, (ii) use of premeasured artificial chordae (PTFE loops) and (iii) preoperative CT scans. Comparisons were made before and after the introduction of technical improvements.

resultsA total of 741 patients underwent isolated mitral valve (MV) procedure, whereas 259 received concomitant procedures. These consisted of tricuspid valve repair (208), left atrium ablation (145) and persistent foramen ovale or atrial septum defect (ASD) closure (172). The aetiology was degenerative in 738 (73.8%) patients and functional in 101 patients (10.1%). A total of 900 patients received MV repair (90%), and 100 patients (10%) underwent MV replacement. Perioperative survival was 99.1%, and periprocedural success 93.5% with a periprocedural safety of 96.3%. Improvement in periprocedural safety attributed to the lower rates of postoperative low output (P = 0.025) and less reoperations for bleeding (P < 0.001). 3D visualization improved cross-clamp (P = 0.001) but not cardiopulmonary bypass times. The use of loops and preoperative CT scan both had no impact on periprocedural success or safety but improved cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times (both P < 0.001).

conclusionsIncreased surgical experience improves safety in MIMVS. Technical improvements are related to increased operative success and decreased operative times in patients undergoing MIMVS.

Indexed as

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgeryMitral valve diseaseTechnical innovation

Identifiers

PMID36866493
PMCPMC9982358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.