ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2023
A qualitative improvement program for minimally invasive mitral surgery: technical advancements ameliorate outcome and operative times.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of comorbidities on surgical outcome and mortality in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Transition from Direct-View to Totally Endoscopic Mitral Valve Surgery in an Experienced Minimally Invasive Center: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Silent Cost of Gender in Mitral Valve Surgery: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026Article
- Dual-Camera Port Setup Strategies for Totally Endoscopic Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgery.Cureus · 2025Article
- Innovative balloon-inflatable venous cannula for enhanced cardiopulmonary bypass in minimally invasive cardiac surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Five-year outcomes of different techniques for minimally invasive mitral valve repair in Barlow's disease.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024Article
- Commentary: The End of the Learning Curve Is the Beginning of Good Judgment.Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMinimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has evolved over the last 2 decades. The aim of the study was to identify the impact of era and technical improvements on perioperative outcome after MIMVS.
methodsA tota of 1000 patients (mean age: 60.8 ± 12.7 years, 60.3% male) underwent video-assisted or totally endoscopic MIMVS between 2001 and 2020 in a single institution. Three technical modalities were introduced during the observed period: (i) 3D visualization, (ii) use of premeasured artificial chordae (PTFE loops) and (iii) preoperative CT scans. Comparisons were made before and after the introduction of technical improvements.
resultsA total of 741 patients underwent isolated mitral valve (MV) procedure, whereas 259 received concomitant procedures. These consisted of tricuspid valve repair (208), left atrium ablation (145) and persistent foramen ovale or atrial septum defect (ASD) closure (172). The aetiology was degenerative in 738 (73.8%) patients and functional in 101 patients (10.1%). A total of 900 patients received MV repair (90%), and 100 patients (10%) underwent MV replacement. Perioperative survival was 99.1%, and periprocedural success 93.5% with a periprocedural safety of 96.3%. Improvement in periprocedural safety attributed to the lower rates of postoperative low output (P = 0.025) and less reoperations for bleeding (P < 0.001). 3D visualization improved cross-clamp (P = 0.001) but not cardiopulmonary bypass times. The use of loops and preoperative CT scan both had no impact on periprocedural success or safety but improved cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times (both P < 0.001).
conclusionsIncreased surgical experience improves safety in MIMVS. Technical improvements are related to increased operative success and decreased operative times in patients undergoing MIMVS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.