ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2023
Spectroscopic Quantitative Measurement of the Cartilage Surface using Arthroscopy Correlates with a Conventional Macroscopic Grading System.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced systems for intraoperative cartilage evaluation and treatment demonstrate early feasibility and a shift towards integrating artificial intelligence: A scoping review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the cartilage surface profile visualized during arthroscopic surgery and examine its clinical utility by comparing the results of quantitative measurements with a conventional grading system. Methods: Fifty consecutive patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and who underwent arthroscopic surgery were included in this study. A 4 K camera system was used, and the cartilage surface profile was visualized using the augmented reality imaging program. The highlighted image was displayed in 2 colors: black (the worn cartilage area) and green (the part where the cartilage thickness was maintained). The percentage of the green area was calculated using ImageJ and used as an index of cartilage degeneration. The quantitative value was statistically compared with the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade as a conventional macroscopic evaluation. Results: In the quantitative measurement, the median percentage of the green area was 60.7 at ICRS grades 0 and 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 67.3-51.0), 47.2 at grade 2 (IQR, 54.1-39.2), 36.5 at grade 3 (IQR, 43.2-30.4), and 34.0 at grade 4 (IQR, 38.5-29.3). There was a significant difference between the macroscopic grades, except for Grades 3 and 4. There was a significant negative correlation between macroscopic evaluation and quantitative measurement ( Conclusions: The quantitative measurement of the cartilage surface profile using the spectroscopic absorption technique was significantly correlated with the conventional macroscopic grading system and demonstrated fair to good inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities. Level of Evidence: Level II, diagnostic (prospective cohort study).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.