Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36866310›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2023

High Levels of Satisfaction and Adequate Patient-Reported Outcomes After Operative Reconstruction of Multiligament Knee Injury With Allograft Among Patients Aged 40 Years and Older.

Alexander J Toppo, Gabriel S Perrone, Stephen M Sylvia, Benjamin H Miltenberg, Liam H Power, John C Richmond, Matthew J Salzler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Outcomes of acute versus delayed multi-ligament knee injury reconstruction: A retrospective analysis with mean 3.6-year follow-up.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander J ToppoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Gabriel S PerroneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Stephen M SylviaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Benjamin H MiltenbergTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Liam H PowerTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
John C RichmondNew England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Matthew J SalzlerTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Tufts Medical Center · USTufts University · USNew England Baptist Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe injury characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients aged 40 years and older who underwent allograft reconstruction for multiligament knee injury (MLKI). Methods: Records of patients aged 40 years and older who underwent allograft multiligament knee reconstruction at a single institution between 2007 and 2017 with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, concomitant injuries, patient satisfaction, and PROs including International Knee Documentation Committee and Marx activity scores were obtained. Results: Twelve patients were included with a minimum follow-up time of 2.3 years (mean, 6.1; range, 2.3-10.1 years) and a mean age at surgery of 49.8 years. Seven patients were male, and the most common mechanism of injury was sport-related. The most frequently reconstructed MLKIs were anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament (4), anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner (2), and posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner (2). The majority of patients reported satisfaction with their treatment (11). Median International Knee Documentation Committee and Marx scores were 73 (interquartile range, 45.5-88.0) and 3 (interquartile range 0-5), respectively. Conclusions: Patients aged 40 years and older can expect a high level of satisfaction and adequate PROs at 2-years follow-up after operative reconstruction for a MLKI with allograft. This demonstrates that allograft reconstruction for a MLKI in older patients may have clinical utility. Level of Evidence: IV, therapeutic case series.

Identifiers

PMID36866310
PMCPMC9971898
OpenAlexW4313201776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.