ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023
Impact of Donor, Recipient, and Graft Characteristics on Corneal Transplantation Outcomes.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Although several donor, recipient, and graft characteristics have been studied in relation to corneal transplantation outcomes, no study to our knowledge has assessed the impact of donor cooling times on postoperative outcomes longitudinally. With only one corneal graft available for every 70 needed worldwide, this study seeks to identify any factors that could alleviate this shortage. Methods: Patients undergoing corneal transplantation at the Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hospital over a 2-year period were retrospectively studied. Study metrics included age, diabetic history, hypertensive history, endothelial cell density, death-to-preservation time (DTP), death-to-cooling time (DTC), and time-in-preservation (TIP). Postoperative transplantation outcomes, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, need for re-bubbling, and need for re-grafting, were assessed. Unadjusted univariate and adjusted multivariate binary logistic regressions were performed to determine the association of cooling and preservation parameters with corneal transplantation outcomes. Results: Among 111 transplants, our adjusted model found that DTC ≥4 hours was associated with significantly worse BCVA, but only at 6-month postoperative follow-up (odds ratio [OR]: 0.234; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.073-0.747; p = 0.014). By 12-month follow-up, DTC >4 hours was no longer associated with BCVA in a statistically significant manner (OR: 0.472; 95% CI: 0.135-1.653; p = 0.240). A similar trend was found at a DTC cutoff of ≥3 hours. None of the other studied parameters, including DTP, TIP, donor age, or medical history were significantly correlated with transplantation outcomes. Conclusion: Longer DTC or DTP did not have a statistically significant effect on corneal graft outcomes after one year, though short-term outcomes were improved in donor tissues with DTC below four hours. None of the other studied variables correlated with transplantation outcomes. Given the global shortage of corneal tissue, these findings should be considered when determining suitability for transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.