ArticleToxicology research2023
Estimating drug-induced liver injury risk by in vitro molecular initiation response and pharmacokinetic parameters for during early drug development.
Article in Toxicology research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A human liver organoids-on-chip for the assessment of drug-induced liver injury.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major factor influencing new drug withdrawal; therefore, an appropriate toxicity assessment at the preclinical stage is required. Previous in silico models have been established using compound information listed in large data sources, thereby limiting the DILI risk prediction for new drugs. Herein, we first constructed a model to predict DILI risk based on a molecular initiating event (MIE) predicted by quantitative structure-activity relationships, admetSAR parameters (e.g. cytochrome P450 reactivity, plasma protein binding, and water-solubility), and clinical information (maximum daily dose [MDD] and reactive metabolite [RM]) for 186 compounds. The accuracy of the models using MIE, MDD, RM, and admetSAR alone were 43.2%, 47.3%, 77.0%, and 68.9%, while the "predicted MIE + admetSAR + MDD + RM" model's accuracy was 75.7%. The contribution of MIE to the overall prediction accuracy was little effect or rather worsening it. However, it was considered that MIE was a valuable parameter and that it contributed to detect high DILI risk compounds in the early development stage. We next examined the effect of stepwise changes in MDD on altering the DILI risk and estimating the maximum safety dose (MSD) for clinical use based on structural information, admetSAR, and MIE parameters because it is important to estimate the dose that could prevent the DILI onset in clinical conditions. Low-MSD compounds might increase the DILI risk, as these compounds were classified as "most-DILI concern" at low doses. In conclusion, MIE parameters were especially useful to check the DILI concern compounds and to prevent the underestimation of DILI risk in the early stage of drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.