ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2023
Use of force-velocity relationship to estimate the one-repetition maximum leg press exercise among young females.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intra-Session Reliability and Predictive Value of Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction for Estimating One-Repetition Maximum in Older Women: A Randomised Split-Sample Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Impact of a 20-Week Resistance Training Program on the Force-Velocity Profile in Novice Lifters Using Isokinetic Two-Point Testing.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to determine the concurrent validity of using force at a velocity of 0 m/s when estimating the one-repetition maximum leg press and develop and assess the accuracy of an equation to estimate the one-repetition maximum value. [Participants and Methods] Ten untrained healthy females participated. We directly measured the one-repetition maximum during the one leg press exercise and developed the individual force-velocity relationship using the trial with the highest mean propulsive velocity at 20% and 70% of the one-repetition maximum. We then used the force at a velocity of 0 m/s to estimate the measured one-repetition maximum. [Results] The force at a velocity of 0 m/s was strongly correlated with the measured one-repetition maximum. A simple linear regression analysis revealed a significant estimated regression equation. The multiple coefficient of the determination of this equation was 0.77, while the standard error of the estimate of the equation was 12.5 kg. [Conclusion] The estimation method based on the force-velocity relationship was highly valid and accurate at estimating the one-repetition maximum for the one leg press exercise. The method provides valuable information to instruct untrained participants at the start of resistance training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.