ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2022
Implementing molecular tuberculosis diagnostic methods in limited-resource and high-burden countries.
Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing gaps through innovation in the tuberculosis pathology value chain.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026Review
- Targeted next-generation sequencing for direct drug-resistant tuberculosis detection in sputum samples in Indonesia: an implementation study (2024-25).The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026Article
- The role of the UNITE4TB Young Investigators Group in empowering early career researchers through mentorship, capacity building, and innovation.IJTLD open · 2026Article
- Article
- Plasma exosomal miR-122-5p_R-1, miR-23b-3p_R + 1, and miR-15a-5p_R-1 are associated with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- UShER-TB: Scalable, Comprehensive, Accessible Phylogenomic Analysis ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Clinical diagnosis of TB: lessons on misdiagnosis and overdiagnosis.Public health action · 2025Article
- Performance evaluation of the AFIAS IGRA-TB (IFN-gamma) test versus QuantiFERON®-TB gold plus (QFT®-Plus) ELISA in the Barrio Obrero hospital network, Asunción-Paraguay, 2025.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Strategies to Enhance Diagnostic Capabilities for the New Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (DR-TB) Drugs.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Breaking barriers: The potential of nanosystems in antituberculosis therapy.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the deadliest infectious diseases in the world with more than a million people dying of TB each year. Accurate and timely TB diagnosis has the potential to alleviate the global TB burden; therefore, one of the pillars of the End TB Strategy developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) is the early diagnosis of TB, including universal drug-susceptibility testing (DST). The WHO emphasises the importance of DST before treatment initiation, using molecular WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests (mWRDs). Currently available mWRDs are nucleic acid amplification tests, line probe assays, whole genome sequencing, and targeted next-generation sequencing. However, implementing the sequencing mWRDs in routine laboratories in low-income countries is constrained by the existing infrastructure, high cost, the specialised skills needed, data storage, and the current delay in results compared with other routine methods. These limitations are pronounced in resource-limited settings, which often have a high TB burden and need for innovative TB diagnostic technologies. In this article we propose several possible solutions, like adapting infrastructure capacity to needs, advocating for lowering costs, building bioinformatics and laboratory capacity, and increasing the use of open-access resources for software and publications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.