ReviewJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2023
Impact of VALID Act implementation on mass spectrometry-based clinical proteomic laboratory developed tests.
Review in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial lipidomic combining DESI imaging and LESA mass spectrometry to evaluate metabolic alterations in obese zebrafish.Journal of lipid research · 2026Article
- Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of FFPE tissues: progress, limitations, and clinical translation barriers.Clinical proteomics · 2025Review
- Predicting and Treating Pulmonary Fibrosis with Proteomic Biomarker Investigations.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The Role of Mechanistic Biomarkers in Understanding Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity in Humans.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2024Review
- Patient safety and healthcare quality of U.S. laboratory developed tests (LDTs) in the AI/ML era of precision medicine.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS)-based clinical proteomic Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) for the measurement of protein biomarkers related to endocrinology, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and Alzheimer's disease are gaining traction in clinical laboratories due to their value in supporting diagnostic and treatment decisions for patients. Under the current regulatory landscape, MS-based clinical proteomic LDTs are regulated by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) under the auspices of the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS). However, should the Verifying Accurate Leading-Edge In Vitro Clinical Test Development (VALID) Act pass, it will grant the FDA greater authority to oversee diagnostic tests, including LDTs. This could impede clinical laboratories' ability to develop new MS-based proteomic LDTs to support existing and emerging patient care needs. Therefore, this review discusses the currently available MS-based proteomic LDTs and their current regulatory landscape in the context of the potential impacts imposed by the passage of the VALID Act.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.