Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36865712›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry

Comparative Evaluation of the Remineralization Potential of Fluoride-containing Toothpaste, Honey Ginger Paste and Ozone. An

Kimaya K Kade, Shweta Chaudhary, Rohan Shah, Smita Patil, Alok Patel, Amol Kamble

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. SmilebrightMethods and protocols · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimaya K KadeDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5580-4864
Shweta ChaudharyDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Rohan ShahDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Smita PatilDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Alok PatelDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Amol KambleDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital (Deemed to be University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A drop in pH of the oral cavity results in demineralization, which, if continued, leads to loss of minerals from tooth structure, resulting in dental caries. A goal of modern dentistry is to manage noncavitated caries lesions noninvasively through remineralization in an attempt to prevent disease progression. Materials and methods: A total of 40 extracted premolar teeth were selected for the study. The specimens were divided into four groups, group I, the control group; group II, remineralizing agent as fluoride toothpaste; group III, the treatment material as ginger and honey paste; and group IV, the treatment material as ozone oil. An initial reading of surface roughness and hardness was recorded for the group (control group). Repeated treatment has continued lasting 21 days. This saliva was changed each day. Following the lesion formation procedure, the surface microhardness was measured for all specimens. The parameters were 200 gm force for 15 seconds with a Vickers indenter and the roughness of the demineralized area of each specimen was obtained by using the surface roughness tester. Results: Surface roughness was checked by using a surface roughness tester. Before starting the pH cycle, the baseline value for the control group was calculated. The baseline value for the control group was calculated. The surface roughness average value for 10 samples is 0.555 µm and the average surface microhardness is 304 HV; the average surface roughness value for fluoride is 0.244 µm and the microhardness is 256 HV, 0.241 µm, and 271 HV value for honey-ginger paste. For ozone surface roughness average value is 0.238 µm and the surface microhardness average mean value is 253 HV. Conclusion: The future of dentistry will rely on the regeneration of tooth structure. There is no significant difference seen between each treatment group. Considering the adverse effect of fluoride, we can consider honey-ginger and ozone as good remineralizing agents for fluoride. How to cite this article: Kade KK, Chaudhary S, Shah R,

Indexed as

GingerHoneyOzone oilPreventiveRemineralizationSurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID36865712
PMCPMC9973117
OpenAlexW4318998550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.