Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36865703›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2023

The effect of a plasma next-generation sequencing test on antimicrobial management in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients-A single-center retrospective study.

Denise Marie A Francisco, Laila Woc-Colburn, Travis J Carlson, Todd Lasco, Miriam Barrett, Mayar Al Mohajer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A one-year hospital system review of plasma next-generation sequencing in a mixed population.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Denise Marie A FranciscoSection of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1410-0881
Laila Woc-ColburnDivision of Infectious Diseases Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Travis J CarlsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, High Point University Fred Wilson School of Pharmacy, High Point, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9564-3030
Todd LascoDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Microbiology, CHI St. Luke's Health-Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Miriam BarrettDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Microbiology, CHI St. Luke's Health-Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Mayar Al MohajerSection of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Baylor College of Medicine · USSt. Luke's Hospital · USEmory University · USHigh Point University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and to determine whether NGS leads to changes in antimicrobial management. Design and setting: This retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥18 years admitted to a single tertiary-care center in Houston, Texas, with an NGS test performed between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. Patients: In total, 167 NGS tests were performed. Most patients were of non-Hispanic ethnicity (n = 129), white (n = 106), and male (n = 116), with a mean age of 52 years (SD, 16). Moreover, 61 patients were immunocompromised: solid-organ transplant (n = 30), patients with human immunodeficiency virus (n = 14), and rheumatology patients on immunosuppressive therapy (n = 12). Results: Of the 167 NGS tests performed, 118 (71%) were positive. Test results associated with a change in antimicrobial management were found in 120 (72%) of 167 cases, with an average of 0.32 (SD, 1.57) fewer antimicrobials after the test. The largest change in antimicrobial management was in glycopeptide use (36 discontinuations) followed by antimycobacterial drug use (27 additions among 8 patients). Also, 49 patients had negative NGS results, but only 36 patients had their antibiotics discontinued. Conclusions: Plasma NGS testing is associated with a change in antimicrobial management in most cases. We observed a decrease in glycopeptide use after NGS results, which highlights physicians' comfort in withdrawing methicillin-resistant

Identifiers

PMID36865703
PMCPMC9972541
OpenAlexW4321215081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.