Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36865608›Full record

ReviewBulletin of the World Health Organization2023

Stillbirth undercount in the sample registration system and national family health survey, India.

Rakhi Dandona, Sibin George, Moutushi Majumder, Mohamed Akbar, G Anil Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Beyond Counting Deaths: Why India must Strengthen Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems for Equitable Health Governance.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Turning the tide with better data to address stillbirths in India.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rakhi DandonaPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana 122 002, India Gurugram, India.
Sibin GeorgePublic Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana 122 002, India Gurugram, India.
Moutushi MajumderPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana 122 002, India Gurugram, India.
Mohamed AkbarPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana 122 002, India Gurugram, India.
G Anil KumarPublic Health Foundation of India, Plot 47, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana 122 002, India Gurugram, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the extent of under-reporting of stillbirths in India by comparing stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates from two national data sources and to review possible reasons for undercounting of stillbirths. Methods: We extracted data on stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates from the annual reports for 2016-2020 of the sample registration system, the Indian government's main source of vital statistics. We compared the data with estimates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates from the fifth round of the Indian national family health survey covering events from 2016-2021. We reviewed the questionnaires and manuals from both surveys and compared the sample registration system's verbal autopsy tool with other international tools. Findings: The stillbirth rate for India from the national family health survey (9.7 stillbirths per 1000 births; 95% confidence interval: 9.2-10.1) was 2.6 times higher than the average rate reported in the sample registration system over 2016-2020 (3.8 stillbirths per 1000 births). However, neonatal mortality rates in the two data sources were similar. We identified issues with the definition of stillbirth, documentation of gestation period, and categorization of miscarriages and abortions that could result in undercounting stillbirths in the sample registration system. In the national family health survey only one adverse pregnancy outcome is documented, irrespective of the number of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the given period. Conclusion: For India to attain its 2030 target of single-digit stillbirth rate and to monitor actions to end preventable stillbirths, efforts are needed to improve the documentation of stillbirths in its data collection systems.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityStillbirthFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36865608
PMCPMC9948498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.