ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2023
Artificial intelligence-enabled mobile electrocardiograms for event prediction in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Occurrence With Handheld Mobile Electrocardiogram: Deep Learning Model Development Using Real-World Data.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for atrial fibrillation prediction while in sinus rhythm: a narrative review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of handheld single-lead electrocardiograms to predict incident atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the VITAL-AF randomized trial.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Detection of atrial fibrillation via artificial intelligence-assisted auscultation.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- POC Sensor Systems and Artificial Intelligence-Where We Are Now and Where We Are Going?Biosensors · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced six-lead portable electrocardiogram device for detecting left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a prospective single-centre cohort study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Individualized prediction of atrial fibrillation onset risk based on lifelogs.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Demystifying AI for early AF detection: enhancing diagnostic transparency across modalities.The British journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in neurocardiology: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- AI-Enhanced ECG Applications in Cardiology: Comprehensive Insights from the Current Literature with a Focus on COVID-19 and Multiple Cardiovascular Conditions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing Cardiology through Artificial Intelligence-Big Data from Proactive Prevention to Precise Diagnostics and Cutting-Edge Treatment-A Comprehensive Review of the Past 5 Years.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- What Else Can AI See in a Digital ECG?Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) often eludes early diagnosis, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used to predict AF from sinus rhythm electrocardiograms (ECGs), but AF prediction using sinus rhythm mobile electrocardiograms (mECG) remains unexplored. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of AI to predict AF events prospectively and retrospectively using sinus rhythm mECG data. Methods: We trained a neural network to predict AF events from sinus rhythm mECGs obtained from users of the Alivecor KardiaMobile 6L device. We tested our model on sinus rhythm mECGs within ±0-2 days, ±3-7 days, and ±8-30 days from AF events to determine the optimal screening window. Finally, we tested our model on mECGs from before an AF event to determine whether AF can be predicted prospectively. Results: We included 73,861 users with 267,614 mECGs (mean age 58.14 years; 35% women). Users with paroxysmal AF contributed 60.15% of mECGs. Model performance on the test set comprising control and study samples across all windows of interest showed an area under the curve (AUC) score of 0.760 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.759-0.760), sensitivity of 0.703 (95% CI 0.700-0.705), specificity of 0.684 (95% CI 0.678-0.685), and accuracy of 69.4% (95% CI 0.692-0.700). Model performance was better on ±0-2 day samples (sensitivity 0.711; 95% CI 0.709-0.713) and worse on the ±8-30 day window (sensitivity 0.688; 95% CI 0.685-0.690), with performance on the ±3-7 day window falling in between (sensitivity 0.708; 95% CI 0.704-0.710). Conclusion: Neural networks can predict AF using a widely scalable and cost-effective mobile technology prospectively and retrospectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.