ArticleFrontiers in genome editing2023
EU regulation of gene-edited plants-A reform proposal.
Article in Frontiers in genome editing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering crop determinacy: CRISPR/Cas based advances in self-pruning gene function and application.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Pepino Mosaic Virus in Tomato: Challenges, Control Strategies, and Future Prospects for Resistance Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Creating an Improved Diatoxanthin Production Line by Knocking OutMarine drugs · 2025Article
- Morphogenetic Factors as a Tool for Enhancing Plant Regeneration Capacity During In Vitro Transformation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advantages of Mutant Generation by Genome Rearrangements of Non-Conventional Yeast via Direct Nuclease Transfection.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2025Article
- Plant immunity to insect herbivores: mechanisms, interactions, and innovations for sustainable pest management.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Article
- A Walk on the Wild Side: Genome Editing of Tuber-BearingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a proposal on how the European Union's regulatory framework on genetically modified (GM) plants should be reformed in light of recent developments in genomic plant breeding techniques. The reform involves a three-tier system reflecting the genetic changes and resulting traits of GM plants. The article is intended to contribute to the ongoing debate over how best to regulate plant gene editing techniques in the EU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.