Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36865556›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Improved memory CD8 T cell response to delayed vaccine boost is associated with a distinct molecular signature.

Ambra Natalini, Sonia Simonetti, Gabriele Favaretto, Lorenzo Lucantonio, Giovanna Peruzzi, Miguel Muñoz-Ruiz, Gavin Kelly, Alessandra M Contino, Roberta Sbrocchi, Simone Battella and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ambra NataliniInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Rome, Italy.
Sonia SimonettiInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Rome, Italy.
Gabriele FavarettoInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo LucantonioInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Rome, Italy.
Giovanna PeruzziCenter for Life Nano- & Neuro-Science, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Rome, Italy.
Miguel Muñoz-RuizImmunosurveillance Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Gavin KellyBioinformatic and Biostatistics Science and Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Alessandra M ContinoReiThera S.R.L., Rome, Italy.
Roberta SbrocchiReiThera S.R.L., Rome, Italy.
Simone BattellaReiThera S.R.L., Rome, Italy.
Stefania CaponeReiThera S.R.L., Rome, Italy.
Antonella FolgoriReiThera S.R.L., Rome, Italy.
Alfredo NicosiaCEINGE, Naples, Italy.
Angela SantoniIRCCS Neuromed, Isernia, Italy.
Adrian C HaydayImmunosurveillance Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Francesca Di RosaInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Rome, Italy.
National Research Council · ITThe Francis Crick Institute · GBCeinge Biotecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITItalian Institute of Technology · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

Cancer Research UK FC001003Medical Research Council FC001003Wellcome Trust FC001003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective secondary response to antigen is a hallmark of immunological memory. However, the extent of memory CD8 T cell response to secondary boost varies at different times after a primary response. Considering the central role of memory CD8 T cells in long-lived protection against viral infections and tumors, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the changing responsiveness of these cells to antigenic challenge would be beneficial. We examined here primed CD8 T cell response to boost in a BALB/c mouse model of intramuscular vaccination by priming with HIV-1 gag-encoding Chimpanzee adenovector, and boosting with HIV-1 gag-encoding Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara. We found that boost was more effective at day(d)100 than at d30 post-prime, as evaluated at d45 post-boost by multi-lymphoid organ assessment of gag-specific CD8 T cell frequency, CD62L-expression (as a guide to memory status) and

Indexed as

CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesImmunization, SecondaryImmunological Memory CellsVaccinesAnimalsCell DivisionMiceMice, Inbred BALB CVaccinationVaccinia virusVaccinesCD8 T cellsmemoryprime-boost intervaltranscriptomic profilevaccination

Identifiers

PMID36865556
PMCPMC9973452
OpenAlexW4320718467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.