ArticleHeliyon2023
The clinical significance of complete process management for the quality control of horizontal rotational resection of a breast mass.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on the effective dose of alfentanil combined with ciprofol in inhibiting intraoperative body movement responses in patients undergoing breast lump resection.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Trial
- A Comparative Study of Esketamine-Propofol and Sufentanil-Propofol for Analgesia and Sedation During Breast Minimally Invasive Rotary Resection with Local Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Trial
- A machine learning-based predictive model for complication risks in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical outcomes of the complete process management of horizontal rotational resection of a breast mass. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving 638 patients who underwent horizontal rotational resection of breast tissue in the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery of the People's Hospital of China Medical University from August 2018 to August 2020 using the ultrasound Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification of 4A and below. These patients were divided into the experimental group and the control group based on whether the surgery had been performed following the order of the complete process management. The time cutoff point for the two groups was June 2019. The propensity score matching method was used to implement 1:1 ratio matching according to age, mass size, location, ultrasound BI-RADS classification, and breast size (measured by basal diameter), and the patients in the two groups were compared for the duration of surgery (the time needed to performed the three-step 3D positioning), postoperative skin hematoma and ecchymosis, postoperative pathological malignancy rate, residual rate of the mass, and satisfaction rate. Results: After 278 pairs were matched, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of demographics (P > 0.05). The duration of surgery in the experimental group was significantly shorter compared with the control group (7.90 ± 2.18 min vs. 10.20 ± 5.99 min, respectively; Conclusion: Complete process management for horizontal rotational resection of a breast mass can shorten the duration of surgery, reduce the residual mass, postoperative bleeding, and postoperative malignancy rates, and improve the breast preservation rate and patient satisfaction. Accordingly, its popularization represents research value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.