Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36865456›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Reflective teaching and academic optimism as correlates of work engagement among university instructors.

Fangyuan Li, Farnoosh Mohammaddokht, Hamed Mohammad Hosseini, Jalil Fathi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fangyuan LiElectronic Information School, Zhejiang Business Technology Institute, Zhejiang Province, 315012, China.
Farnoosh MohammaddokhtDepartment of English and Linguistics, Faculty of Language and Literature, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Hamed Mohammad HosseiniDepartment of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Iran.
Jalil FathiDepartment of English and Linguistics, Faculty of Language and Literature, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
University of Kurdistan · IRIslamic Azad University, Tehran · IRZhejiang Business Technology Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As teaching is a complex and demanding activity especially in university and higher education contexts, exploring the correlates of work engagement in university contexts seems to be a promising research area. As an attempt to further clarify this research area, this study sought to examine the significance of reflective teaching and academic optimism as correlates of work engagement among university instructors in Iran. Having been selected via convenience sampling, a sample of 289 Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) university instructors participated in this survey. The electronic versions of the scales of teacher academic optimism, reflective teaching, and work engagement were administered to the participants. Initially, the construct validity of the scales was verified for the university contexts via performing confirmatory factor analysis. Then the hypothesized structural relationships among the constructs were tested using structural equation modelling (SEM). The results demonstrated that both reflective teaching and academic optimism significantly predicted work engagement among English university instructors. Some notable implications are finally discussed based on these findings.

Indexed as

Academic optimismEFL university InstructorsReflective teachingSEMWork engagement

Identifiers

PMID36865456
PMCPMC9971167
OpenAlexW4320912710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.