ArticleHeliyon2023
Clinical implications of hemodynamic analysis for the three-dimension iliac vein model with different stenosis.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simultaneous quantitative evaluation of both iliac arteries and veins via accelerated four-dimensional flow in healthy controls and patients with deep vein thrombosis: a pilot study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Hemodynamic characteristics and clinical treatment of patients with iliac vein compression syndrome.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Numerical simulation and in vitro experimental study of the hemodynamic performance of vena cava filters with helical forms.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A 3D scaling law for supravalvular aortic stenosis suited for stethoscopic auscultations.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to perform hemodynamic simulations of a three-dimension ideal inferior vena cava-iliac vein model with artificial stenosis to determine the degree of stenosis that requires clinical intervention. Methods: Four three-dimension stenosis models (30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% stenosis) were constructed using commercial software (Solidworks). The inlet flow rates were acquired from previous literatures to perform the hemodynamic simulations. Changes in the old blood volume fraction, as well conventional hemodynamic parameters including pressure, differential pressure, wall shear stress, and flow patterns, over time were recorded. The pressure at the telecentric region of the stenosis increased with increasing degree of stenosis. Results: For the 70% stenosis model, the pressure at the telecentric region of the stenosis reached 341 Pa, and the differential pressure between the two ends of the stenosis was 363 Pa (approximately 2.7 mmHg). Moreover, in the 70% and 90% stenosis models, there was a marked change in wall shear stress in the stenosis and the proximal end region, and the flow patterns began to show the phenomenon of flow separation. Blood stasis analysis showed that the 70% stenosis model had the slowest decrease in old blood volume fraction, while the proximal end region had the largest blood residue (15%). Conclusion: Iliac vein stenosis of approximately 70% is associated with clinically relevant hemodynamic changes, and is more closely related to DVT than other degrees of stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.