Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36865393›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

Association between the colorectal cancer screening status of primary care physicians and their patients: Evidence from the Swiss Sentinella practice-based research network.

Tamara Scharf, Claudia Hügli, Yonas Martin, Kali Tal, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Charles Dvořák, Jean-Luc Bulliard, Cyril Ducros, Kevin Selby, Reto Auer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tamara ScharfInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Claudia HügliInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Yonas MartinInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Kali TalInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
Nikola Biller-AndornoInstitute for Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, UZH, Zürich, Switzerland.
Charles DvořákPast President Sentinella Network, Switzerland.
Jean-Luc BulliardCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cyril DucrosCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kevin SelbyCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Reto AuerInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHCentre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHInstitute for Biomedical Engineering · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swiss health insurance reimburses screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) with either colonoscopy or fecal occult blood test (FOBT). Studies have documented the association between a physician's personal preventive health practices and the practices they recommend to their patients. We explored the association between CRC testing status of primary care physicians (PCP) and the testing rate among their patients. From May 2017 to September 2017, we invited 129 PCP who belonged to the Swiss Sentinella Network to disclose their CRC test status and whether they had been tested with colonoscopy or FOBT/other methods. Each participating PCP collected demographic data and CRC testing status from 40 consecutive 50- to 75-year-old patients. We analyzed data from 69 (54%) PCP 50 years or older and 2623 patients. Most PCP were men (81%); 75% were tested for CRC (67% with colonoscopy and 9% with FOBT). Mean patient age was 63; 50% were women; 43% had been tested for CRC (38%, 1000/2623 with colonoscopy and 5%, 131/2623, with FOBT or other non-endoscopic test). In multivariate adjusted regression models that clustered patients by PCP, the proportion of patients tested for CRC was higher among PCP tested for CRC than among PCP not tested (47% vs 32%; OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.85). Since PCP CRC testing status is associated with their patients CRC testing rates, it informs future interventions that will alert PCPs to the influence of their health decisions and motivate them to further incorporate the values and preferences of their patients in their practice.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal cancerCRC, colorectal cancerFecal occult blood testingFIT, fecal immunochemical testFOBT, fecal occult blood testFOPH, Federal Office of Public HealthPCP, primary care physiciansPrimary health careScreeningVariation in care

Identifiers

PMID36865393
PMCPMC9971517
OpenAlexW4320487143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.