Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36865312›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

The Acceptability of Self-Collected Samples for STI Testing: A Qualitative Study Among Adults in Rakai, Uganda.

Yasmin P Ogale, M Kathryn Grabowski, Proscovia Nabakka, William Ddaaki, Rosette Nakubulwa, Neema Nakyanjo, Fred Nalugoda, Joseph Kagaayi, Godfrey Kigozi, Julie A Denison and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yasmin P OgaleJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
M Kathryn GrabowskiHopkins School of Medicine.
Proscovia NabakkaRakai Health Sciences Program.
William DdaakiRakai Health Sciences Program.
Rosette NakubulwaRakai Health Sciences Program.
Neema NakyanjoRakai Health Sciences Program.
Fred NalugodaRakai Health Sciences Program.
Joseph KagaayiRakai Health Sciences Program.
Godfrey KigoziRakai Health Sciences Program.
Julie A DenisonJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Charlotte GaydosJohns Hopkins School of Medicine.
Caitlin E KennedyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Rakai Health Sciences Program · UGJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Anna Palmer Durbin · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
Research Infrastructure for the Hopkins Population CenterR24HD042854 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAO, LINGXIN · 2003 to 2017
$5.1M
The Hopkins Population CenterP2CHD042854 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FEINIAN CHEN · 2021 to 2026
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042854NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Self-collected samples (SCS) for sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing have been shown to be feasible and acceptable in high-resource settings. However, few studies have assessed the acceptability of SCS for STI testing in a general population in low-resource settings. This study explored the acceptability of SCS among adults in south-central Uganda. Methods: Nested within the Rakai Community Cohort Study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 symptomatic and asymptomatic adults who self-collected samples for STI testing. We analyzed the data using an adapted version of the Framework Method. Results: Overall, participants did not find SCS physically uncomfortable. Reported acceptability did not meaningfully differ by gender or symptom status. Perceived advantages to SCS included increased privacy and confidentiality, gentleness, and efficiency. Disadvantages included the lack of provider involvement, fear of self-harm and the perception that SCS was unhygienic. Most participants preferred provider-collected samples to SCS. Nevertheless, almost all said they would recommend SCS and would do it again in the future. Conclusion: Despite a preference for provider-collection, SCS are acceptable among adults in this setting and support expanded access to STI diagnostic services.

Indexed as

low-resourceself-careself-collectionself-samplingsexually transmitted diseasesexually transmitted infection

Identifiers

PMID36865312
PMCPMC9980269
OpenAlexW4321605497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.