Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36865296›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Application of simultaneous uncertainty quantification for image segmentation with probabilistic deep learning: Performance benchmarking of oropharyngeal cancer target delineation as a use-case.

Jaakko Sahlsten, Joel Jaskari, Kareem A Wahid, Sara Ahmed, Enrico Glerean, Renjie He, Benjamin H Kann, Antti Mäkitie, Clifton D Fuller, Mohamed A Naser and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jaakko SahlstenDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Joel JaskariDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Kareem A WahidDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Sara AhmedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Enrico GlereanDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Renjie HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Benjamin H KannArtificial Intelligence in Medicine Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA.
Antti MäkitieDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Clifton D FullerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Mohamed A NaserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA.
Kimmo KaskiDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Image Guided Cancer Therapy Training ProgramT32CA261856 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kristy Brock, Clifton David Fuller · 2022 to 2026
$1.2M
Development of an artificial intelligence-driven, imaging-based platform for pretreatment identification of extranodal extension in head and neck cancerK08DE030216 · NIDCR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KANN, BENJAMIN HARRIS · 2021 to 2025
$841k
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artificial Intelligence Pipeline for Oropharyngeal Cancer Radiotherapy Treatment GuidanceF31DE031502 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI WAHID, KAREEM · 2021 to 2023
$68k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS T32 CA261856NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE031502NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE030216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a widespread disease, with radiotherapy being a core treatment modality. Manual segmentation of the primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) is currently employed for OPC radiotherapy planning, but is subject to significant interobserver variability. Deep learning (DL) approaches have shown promise in automating GTVp segmentation, but comparative (auto)confidence metrics of these models predictions has not been well-explored. Quantifying instance-specific DL model uncertainty is crucial to improving clinician trust and facilitating broad clinical implementation. Therefore, in this study, probabilistic DL models for GTVp auto-segmentation were developed using large-scale PET/CT datasets, and various uncertainty auto-estimation methods were systematically investigated and benchmarked. Methods: We utilized the publicly available 2021 HECKTOR Challenge training dataset with 224 co-registered PET/CT scans of OPC patients with corresponding GTVp segmentations as a development set. A separate set of 67 co-registered PET/CT scans of OPC patients with corresponding GTVp segmentations was used for external validation. Two approximate Bayesian deep learning methods, the MC Dropout Ensemble and Deep Ensemble, both with five submodels, were evaluated for GTVp segmentation and uncertainty performance. The segmentation performance was evaluated using the volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (MSD), and Hausdorff distance at 95% (95HD). The uncertainty was evaluated using four measures from literature: coefficient of variation (CV), structure expected entropy, structure predictive entropy, and structure mutual information, and additionally with our novel Results: Both models behaved similarly in terms of the segmentation performance and uncertainty estimation. Specifically, the MC Dropout Ensemble had 0.776 DSC, 1.703 mm MSD, and 5.385 mm 95HD. The Deep Ensemble had 0.767 DSC, 1.717 mm MSD, and 5.477 mm 95HD. The uncertainty measure with the highest DSC correlation was structure predictive entropy with correlation coefficients of 0.699 and 0.692 for the MC Dropout Ensemble and the Deep Ensemble, respectively. The highest AvU value was 0.866 for both models. The best performing uncertainty measure for both models was the CV which had R-DSC AUC of 0.783 and 0.782 for the MC Dropout Ensemble and Deep Ensemble, respectively. With referring patients based on uncertainty thresholds from 0.85 validation DSC for all uncertainty measures, on average the DSC improved from the full dataset by 4.7% and 5.0% while referring 21.8% and 22% patients for MC Dropout Ensemble and Deep Ensemble, respectively. Conclusion: We found that many of the investigated methods provide overall similar but distinct utility in terms of predicting segmentation quality and referral performance. These findings are a critical first-step towards more widespread implementation of uncertainty quantification in OPC GTVp segmentation.

Identifiers

PMID36865296
PMCPMC9980236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.