Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36865178›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Training parameters and longitudinal adaptations that most strongly mediate walking capacity gains from high-intensity interval training post-stroke.

Pierce Boyne, Allison Miller, Sarah M Schwab, Heidi Sucharew, Daniel Carl, Sandra A Billinger, Darcy S Reisman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06292442 (Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Muscle Strength, Atrophy and Aerobic Capacity in Stroke Patients.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06292442 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Muscle Strength, Atrophy and Aerobic Capacity in Stroke Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled34ConditionsStrokeArmstraditional physical therapy, High intensity interval training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Allison Miller
Sarah M Schwab
Heidi Sucharew
Daniel Carl
Sandra A Billinger
Darcy S Reisman
Nutrition Sciences (Belgium) · BEOncology Hematology Care · USUniversity of Delaware · USUniversity of Kansas · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Locomotor high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been shown to improve walking capacity more than moderate-intensity aerobic training (MAT) after stroke, but it is unclear which training parameter(s) should be prioritized (e.g. speed, heart rate, blood lactate, step count) and to what extent walking capacity gains are the result of neuromotor versus cardiorespiratory adaptations. Objective: Assess which training parameters and longitudinal adaptations most strongly mediate 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) gains from post-stroke HIIT. Methods: The HIT-Stroke Trial randomized 55 persons with chronic stroke and persistent walking limitations to HIIT or MAT and collected detailed training data. Blinded outcomes included 6MWD, plus measures of neuromotor gait function (e.g. fastest 10-meter gait speed) and aerobic capacity (e.g. ventilatory threshold). This ancillary analysis used structural equation models to compare mediating effects of different training parameters and longitudinal adaptations on 6MWD. Results: Net gains in 6MWD from HIIT versus MAT were primarily mediated by faster training speeds and longitudinal adaptations in neuromotor gait function. Training step count was also positively associated with 6MWD gains, but was lower with HIIT versus MAT, which decreased the net 6MWD gain. HIIT generated higher training heart rate and lactate than MAT, but aerobic capacity gains were similar between groups, and 6MWD changes were not associated with training heart rate, training lactate, or aerobic adaptations. Conclusions: To increase walking capacity with post-stroke HIIT, training speed and step count appear to be the most important parameters to prioritize.

Identifiers

PMID36865178
PMCPMC9980231
OpenAlexW4321605533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.