Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36865020›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2023

Comparison of a chronic kidney disease predictive model for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Malaysia using Cox regression versus machine learning approach.

Ruth Sim, Chun Wie Chong, Navin Kumar Loganadan, Noor Lita Adam, Zanariah Hussein, Shaun Wen Huey Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruth SimSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5667-9521
Chun Wie ChongSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-8883
Navin Kumar LoganadanDepartment of Pharmacy, Putrajaya Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Jalan P9, Presint 7, Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6875-8537
Noor Lita AdamDepartment of Medicine, Hospital Tuanku Jaafar, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Jalan Rasah, Bukit Rasah, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Zanariah HusseinDepartment of Medicine, Putrajaya Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Jalan P9, Presint 7, Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0217-3282
Shaun Wen Huey LeeSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-6576
Ministry of Health · MYMonash University Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is one of the leading causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease. This study aims to develop and validate different risk predictive models for incident CKD and CKD progression in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: We reviewed a cohort of people with T2D seeking care from two tertiary hospitals in the metropolitan cities of the state of Selangor and Negeri Sembilan from January 2012 to May 2021. To identify the 3-year predictor of developing CKD (primary outcome) and CKD progression (secondary outcome), the dataset was randomly split into a training and test set. A Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) model was developed to identify predictors of developing CKD. The resultant CoxPH model was compared with other machine learning models on their performance using C-statistic. Results: The cohorts included 1992 participants, of which 295 had developed CKD and 442 reported worsening of kidney function. Equation for the 3-year risk of developing CKD included gender, haemoglobin A1c, triglyceride and serum creatinine levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate, history of cardiovascular disease and diabetes duration. For risk of CKD progression, the model included systolic blood pressure, retinopathy and proteinuria. The CoxPH model was better at prediction compared with other machine learning models examined for incident CKD (C-statistic: training 0.826; test 0.874) and CKD progression (C-statistic: training 0.611; test 0.655). The risk calculator can be found at https://rs59.shinyapps.io/071221/. Conclusions: The Cox regression model was the best performing model to predict people with T2D who will develop a 3-year risk of incident CKD and CKD progression in a Malaysian cohort.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasediabetesmachine learningprediction

Identifiers

PMID36865020
PMCPMC9972828
OpenAlexW4311819749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.