ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2023
Aortic wall shear stress in bicuspid aortic valve disease-10-year follow-up.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood flow dynamics in the ascending aorta of patients with bicuspid aortic valve before and after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a computational fluid dynamics study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Trial
- Backward Aortic Flow Is Associated with Impaired Left Ventricular Mechanics in Young Adults with Bicuspid Aortic Valve: A Prospective Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical 4D flow MRI assessment in aortopathy-what the clinician needs to know.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
- Multiyear Interval Changes in Aortic Wall Shear Stress in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Assessed by 4D Flow MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease leads to deviant helical flow patterns especially in the mid-ascending aorta (AAo), potentially causing wall alterations such as aortic dilation and dissection. Among others, wall shear stress (WSS) could contribute to the prediction of long-term outcome of patients with BAV. 4D flow in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been established as a valid method for flow visualization and WSS estimation. The aim of this study is to reevaluate flow patterns and WSS in patients with BAV 10 years after the initial evaluation. Methods: Fifteen patients (median age 34.0 years) with BAV were re-evaluated 10 years after the initial study from 2008/2009 using 4D flow by CMR. Our particular patient cohort met the same inclusion criteria as in 2008/2009, all without enlargement of the aorta or valvular impairment at that time. Flow patterns, aortic diameters, WSS and distensibility were calculated in different aortic regions of interest (ROI) with dedicated software tools. Results: Indexed aortic diameters in the descending aorta (DAo), but especially in the AAo did not change in the 10-year period. Median difference 0.05 cm/m Conclusions: After a ten years' follow-up of patients with isolated BAV disease, indexed aortic diameters did not change in this patient cohort. WSS was lower compared to values generated 10 years earlier. Possibly a drop of WSS in BAV could serve as a marker for a benign long-term course and implementation of more conservative treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.