Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864950›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2023

Choosing the right treatment for the right lesion, part I: a narrative review of the role of plain balloon angioplasty in dialysis access maintenance.

Daniel M DePietro, Scott O Trerotola

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel M DePietroDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
Scott O TrerotolaDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The majority of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis (HD) do so via an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or graft. Both of these accesses are complicated by dysfunction related to neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) and subsequent stenosis. Percutaneous balloon angioplasty using plain balloons is the first line treatment for clinically-significant stenosis, with excellent initial response rates, however, with poor long-term patency and need for frequent reintervention. Recent research has sought to improve patency rates utilizing antiproliferative drug-coated balloons (DCBs), however, their role in treatment has not yet been fully determined. In part one of this two-part review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms of arteriovenous (AV) access stenosis, the evidence behind their treatment with high-quality plain balloon angioplasty techniques, and treatment considerations for specific stenotic lesions. Methods: An electronic search was performed on PubMed and EMBASE to identify relevant articles from 1980 to 2022. The highest available level of evidence regarding stenosis pathophysiology, angioplasty techniques, and approaches to treating different types of lesions within fistulas and grafts were included as part of this narrative review. Key Content and Findings: NIH, and subsequent stenoses, develop via a combination of upstream events, causing vascular damage, and downstream events, representing the subsequent biologic response. The large majority of stenotic lesions can be treated utilizing high-pressure balloon angioplasty, with the addition of ultra-high pressure balloon (UHPB) angioplasty for resistant lesions and prolonged angioplasty with progressive balloon upsizing for elastic lesions. Additional treatment considerations must be taken into account when treating specific lesions, including cephalic arch and swing point stenoses in fistulas and graft-vein anastomotic stenoses in grafts, amongst others. Conclusions: High-quality plain balloon angioplasty, performed utilizing the available evidence-basis regarding technique and considerations for specific lesion locations, is successful in treating the large majority of AV access stenoses. While initially successful, patency rates remain non-durable. Part two of this review will discuss the evolving role of DCBs, which seek to improve angioplasty outcomes.

Indexed as

angioplastyfistulagraftHemodialysis (HD)stenosis

Identifiers

PMID36864950
PMCPMC9971312
OpenAlexW4312249634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.