Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864932›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology

Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of superficial gastric neoplasms in non-Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Harold Benites-Goñi, Fernando Palacios-Salas, Luis Marín-Calderón, Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa, Alejandro Piscoya, Adrian V Hernandez

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Harold Benites-GoñiUnidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta-análisis (URSIGET), Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (USIL), Peru (Harold Benites-Goñi, Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa, Adrian V. Hernandez).
Fernando Palacios-SalasClínica Delgado, Auna, Lima, Peru (Fernando Palacios-Salas).
Luis Marín-CalderónHospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru (Harold Benites-Goñi, Luis Marín-Calderón).
Carlos Diaz-ArocutipaUnidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta-análisis (URSIGET), Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (USIL), Peru (Harold Benites-Goñi, Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa, Adrian V. Hernandez).
Alejandro PiscoyaHospital Guillermo Kaelin de la Fuente, Lima, Peru (Alejandro Piscoya).
Adrian V HernandezUnidad de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Meta-análisis (URSIGET), Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (USIL), Peru (Harold Benites-Goñi, Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa, Adrian V. Hernandez).
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now considered the standard treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, the widespread adoption of ESD in western countries has been slow. We performed a systematic review to evaluate short-term outcomes of ESD for EGC in non-Asian countries. Methods: We searched 3 electronic databases from inception until October 26, 2022. Primary outcomes were Results: Twenty-seven studies from Europe (n=14), South America (n=11) and North America (n=2) were included, involving 1875 gastric lesions. Overall, Conclusion: Our results suggest that short-term outcomes of ESD for the treatment of EGC are acceptable in non-Asian countries.

Indexed as

Endoscopic submucosal dissectiongastric cancermeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36864932
PMCPMC9932866
OpenAlexW4319990595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.