Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864846›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Clinical aspects of binge eating disorder: A cross-sectional mixed-methods study of binge eating disorder experts' perspectives.

Brenna Bray, Adam Sadowski, Chris Bray, Ryan Bradley, Heather Zwickey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brenna BrayHelfgott Research Institute, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR, United States.
Adam SadowskiHelfgott Research Institute, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR, United States.
Chris BrayWilder Research Division, Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Ryan BradleyHelfgott Research Institute, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR, United States.
Heather ZwickeyHelfgott Research Institute, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR, United States.

Funding

Building Research across Interdisciplinary Gaps (BRIDG) R90 Training Program - Administrative SupplementR90AT008924 · NCCIH · NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL MEDICINE · PI BRADLEY, RYAN D, ZWICKEY, HEATHER LEA · 2015 to 2025
$5.2M
Mentorship in Clinical Complementary and Integrative Health ResearchK24AT011568 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BRADLEY, RYAN D · 2021 to 2025
$762k
NCCIH NIH HHS K24 AT011568NCCIH NIH HHS R90 AT008924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Research on binge eating disorder continues to evolve and advance our understanding of recurrent binge eating. Methods: This mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey aimed to collect information from experts in the field about clinical aspects of adult binge eating disorder pathology. Fourteen experts in binge eating disorder research and clinical care were identified based on receipt of relevant federal funding, PubMed-indexed publications, active practice in the field, leadership in relevant societies, and/or clinical and popular press distinction. Anonymously recorded semi-structured interviews were analyzed by ≥2 investigators using reflexive thematic analysis and quantification. Results: Identified themes included: (1) obesity (100%); (2) intentional/voluntary or unintentional/involuntary food/eating restriction (100%); (3) negative affect, emotional dysregulation, and negative urgency (100%); (4) diagnostic heterogeneity and validity (71%); (5) paradigm shifts in understanding binge eating disorder (29%); and (6) research gaps/future directives (29%). Discussion: Overall, experts call for a better understanding of the relationship between binge eating disorder and obesity, including a need for clarification around the extent to which the two health issues are separate vs. related/overlapping. Experts also commonly endorse food/eating restriction and emotion dysregulation as important components of binge eating disorder pathology, which aligns with two common models of binge eating disorder conceptualization (e.g., dietary restraint theory and emotion/affect regulation theory). A few experts spontaneously identified several paradigm shifts in our understanding of who can have an eating disorder (beyond the anorexi-centric "thin, White, affluent,

Indexed as

binge eatingbinge eating disorderdiagnostic criteriadieteating disorderemotion regulationobesityrestriction

Identifiers

PMID36864846
PMCPMC9971930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.