Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864727›Full record

ArticlePlant communications2023

HOS15 represses flowering by promoting GIGANTEA degradation in response to low temperature in Arabidopsis.

Gyeongik Ahn, Hee Jin Park, Song Yi Jeong, Gyeong-Im Shin, Myung Geun Ji, Joon-Yung Cha, Jeongsik Kim, Min Gab Kim, Dae-Jin Yun, Woe-Yeon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. HOS15-mediated turnover of PRR7 enhances freezing tolerance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Genes · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gyeongik AhnResearch Institute of Life Science, Institute of Agricultural and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea; Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Plant Biological Rhythm Research Center, Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea.
Hee Jin ParkDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea.
Song Yi JeongResearch Institute of Life Science, Institute of Agricultural and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea; Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Plant Biological Rhythm Research Center, Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea.
Gyeong-Im ShinResearch Institute of Life Science, Institute of Agricultural and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea; Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Plant Biological Rhythm Research Center, Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea.
Myung Geun JiResearch Institute of Life Science, Institute of Agricultural and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea; Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Plant Biological Rhythm Research Center, Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea.
Joon-Yung ChaResearch Institute of Life Science, Institute of Agricultural and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea; Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Plant Biological Rhythm Research Center, Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea.
Jeongsik KimFaculty of Science Education and Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Advanced Convergence Technology and Science, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Republic of Korea.
Min Gab KimCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, PMBBRC, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea.
Dae-Jin YunInstitute of Glocal Disease Control, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea; Key Laboratory of Molecular Epigenetics of the Ministry of Education (MOE), Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.
Woe-Yeon KimResearch Institute of Life Science, Institute of Agricultural and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea; Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Plant Biological Rhythm Research Center, Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Graduate School of Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kim1312@gnu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flowering is the primary stage of the plant developmental transition and is tightly regulated by environmental factors such as light and temperature. However, the mechanisms by which temperature signals are integrated into the photoperiodic flowering pathway are still poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that HOS15, which is known as a GI transcriptional repressor in the photoperiodic flowering pathway, controls flowering time in response to low ambient temperature. At 16°C, the hos15 mutant exhibits an early flowering phenotype, and HOS15 acts upstream of photoperiodic flowering genes (GI, CO, and FT). GI protein abundance is increased in the hos15 mutant and is insensitive to the proteasome inhibitor MG132. Furthermore, the hos15 mutant has a defect in low ambient temperature-mediated GI degradation, and HOS15 interacts with COP1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase for GI degradation. Phenotypic analyses of the hos15 cop1 double mutant revealed that repression of flowering by HOS15 is dependent on COP1 at 16°C. However, the HOS15-COP1 interaction was attenuated at 16°C, and GI protein abundance was additively increased in the hos15 cop1 double mutant, indicating that HOS15 acts independently of COP1 in GI turnover at low ambient temperature. This study proposes that HOS15 controls GI abundance through multiple modes as an E3 ubiquitin ligase and transcriptional repressor to coordinate appropriate flowering time in response to ambient environmental conditions such as temperature and day length.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsFlowersTemperatureTranscription FactorsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesArabidopsis ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsGI protein, ArabidopsisHos15 protein, ArabidopsisTranscription FactorsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesArabidopsisflowering responseGIGANTEAHOS15low ambient temperature

Identifiers

PMID36864727
PMCPMC10363504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.