Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864701›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2023

Comparison of liver fibrosis scores for predicting mortality and morbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Yalin Cao, Siyu Guo, Yugang Dong, Chen Liu, Wengen Zhu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00094302 (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00094302 phase3completednot on this map

Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarelon ResearchRan2006 to 2013Enrolled3,445ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Heart Failure, CongestiveArmsSpironolactone, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yalin CaoDepartment of Cardiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China.
Siyu GuoDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yugang DongDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chen LiuDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wengen ZhuDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1280-0158
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsLiver fibrosis scores (LFSs) are non-invasive and effective tools for estimating cardiovascular risks. To better understand the advantages and limitations of currently available LFSs, we determined to compare the predictive values of LFSs in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) for primary composite outcome, atrial fibrillation (AF), and other clinical outcomes. METHODS AND

resultsThis was a secondary analysis of the TOPCAT trial, and 3212 HFpEF patients were enrolled. Five LFSs, namely, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), BARD, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio, and Health Utilities Index (HUI) scores were adopted. Cox proportional hazard model and competing risk regression model were performed to assess the associations between LFSs and outcomes. The discriminatory power of each LFS was evaluated by calculating the area under the curves (AUCs). During a median follow-up of 3.3 years, a 1-point increase in the NFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.17], BARD (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.10-1.30), and HUI (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.09-1.89) scores was associated with an increased risk of primary outcome. Patients with high levels of NFS (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.26-2.13), BARD (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.25-2.15), AST/ALT ratio (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.05-1.60), and HUI (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.02-1.53) were at an increased risk of primary outcome. Subjects who developed AF were more likely to have high NFS (HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.13-4.32). High levels of NFS and HUI scores were a significant predictor of any hospitalization and hospitalization for heart failure. The AUCs for the NFS in predicting primary outcome (0.672; 95% CI 0.642-0.702) and incident of AF (0.678; 95% CI 0.622-0.734) were higher than other LFSs.

conclusionsIn light of these findings, NFS appears to have superior predictive and prognostic utility compared with AST/ALT ratio, FIB-4, BARD, and HUI scores. CLINICAL

trial registration(https://clinicaltrials.gov). Unique identifier: NCT00094302.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationHeart FailureFibrosisHumansLiver CirrhosisMorbidityStroke VolumeAdverse outcomesHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionLiver fibrosis score

Identifiers

PMID36864701
PMCPMC10192244
OpenAlexW4323036092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.