ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Improving annotation propagation on molecular networks through random walks: introducing ChemWalker.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- GNPS2 molecular networking reveals metabolic diversity in fungi isolated from protease-rich fruits.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2026Article
- A versatile toolkit for drug metabolism studies with GNPS2: from drug development to clinical monitoring.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- The undiscovered natural product potential of Actinomycetes.The Journal of antibiotics · 2026Article
- Bioactive Cyclopeptide Alkaloids and Ceanothane Triterpenoids fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effective data visualization strategies in untargeted metabolomics.Natural product reports · 2025Review
- A multi-omics reciprocal analysis for characterization of bacterial metabolism.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Reaping the Chemical Diversity ofJournal of natural products · 2024Article
- A complementary approach for detecting biological signals through a semi-automated feature selection tool.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAnnotation of the mass signals is still the biggest bottleneck for the untargeted mass spectrometry analysis of complex mixtures. Molecular networks are being increasingly adopted by the mass spectrometry community as a tool to annotate large-scale experiments. We have previously shown that the process of propagating annotations from spectral library matches on molecular networks can be automated using Network Annotation Propagation (NAP). One of the limitations of NAP is that the information for the spectral matches is only propagated locally, to the first neighbor of a spectral match. Here, we show that annotation propagation can be expanded to nodes not directly connected to spectral matches using random walks on graphs, introducing the ChemWalker python library.
resultsSimilarly to NAP, ChemWalker relies on combinatorial in silico fragmentation results, performed by MetFrag, searching biologically relevant databases. Departing from the combination of a spectral network and the structural similarity among candidate structures, we have used MetFusion Scoring function to create a weight function, producing a weighted graph. This graph was subsequently used by the random walk to calculate the probability of 'walking' through a set of candidates, departing from seed nodes (represented by spectral library matches). This approach allowed the information propagation to nodes not directly connected to the spectral library match. Compared with NAP, ChemWalker has a series of improvements, on running time, scalability and maintainability and is available as a standalone python package. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ChemWalker is freely available at https://github.com/computational-chemical-biology/ChemWalker. CONTACT: ridasilva@usp.br. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.