Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864538›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2023

Antimicrobials in polymethylmethacrylate: from prevention to prosthetic joint infection treatment: basic principles and risk of resistance.

Marta Sabater-Martos, Miguel A Verdejo, Laura Morata, Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud, Ernesto Guerra-Farfan, Juan C Martinez-Pastor, Alex Soriano

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta Sabater-Martos *Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. msabater@clinic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9350-3648
Miguel A Verdejo *Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura MorataDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Ernesto Muñoz-MahamudDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Ernesto Guerra-FarfanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan C Martinez-PastorDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Alex SorianoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Carrer Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. asoriano@clinic.cat.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcellent revisions about antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) have been recently published. In the present article, we review the principles and limitations of local antibiotic delivery in the context of recent advances in the pathogenesis of prosthetic joint infections (PJI), with particular attention paid to the potential association between ALBC and antimicrobial resistance. MAIN BODY: Recalcitrance of PJI is related to the ability of pathogens to adapt to particular environments present in bone tissue and protect themselves from host immunity in different ways. Accordingly, delivery of high local antimicrobial concentrations using ALBC is needed. Most relevant clinical data showing the efficacy of ALBC for PJI prophylaxis and treatment are reviewed, and we dissected the limitations on the basis of the recent findings from animal models and suggested that aminoglycosides, in particular, could not be the best option. One of the major concerns associated with ALBC is the emergence of resistance because of theoretical prolonged exposure to low antibiotic concentrations. We summarize the mechanisms for the selection of resistant microorganisms, and we critically reviewed the evidence from animal models and clinical data from observational and registry studies and concluded that there is no evidence to support this association.

conclusionWhile waiting for better evidence from well-designed clinical trials, ALBC shows a beneficial effect as a prophylaxis in arthroplasty, and to avoid the colonization of spacers used for two-stage revision in patients with PJI. Experimental models and clinical evidence suggest the need to achieve high local antimicrobial concentrations to obtain the highest prophylactic and therapeutic effect. The current evidence does not support the risk of increasing resistance with use of ALBC. In the future, it is necessary to evaluate new carriers and different antimicrobials to improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibiotic-loaded bone cementAntibiotic prophylaxisAntibiotic resistancePharmacokineticsSpacers

Identifiers

PMID36864538
PMCPMC9983184
OpenAlexW4322767278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.