Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864516›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Creating a best practice template for participant communication plans in global health clinical studies.

Colleen E Shelly, Caroline Logan, Beth Skorochod, Alison Wiyeh, Duduzile Ndwandwe, Augustine Choko, Innocent Valea, Boghuma K Titanji

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Colleen E ShellyHealthAnalytix, LLC, 85 Larch St., Providence, RI, USA. colleen@healthanalytix.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1824-9835
Caroline LoganCollaborateUp Inc, 208 Noland Street, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Beth SkorochodCollaborateUp Inc, 208 Noland Street, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Alison WiyehDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Duduzile NdwandweCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Francie Van Zilj Drive, Parow Valley, Cape Town, South Africa.
Augustine ChokoThe Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro (IRSS-CRUN), Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Innocent ValeaMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital College of Medicine, Blantyre 3, Malawi, C, P.O. Box 30096, Chichiri, South Africa.
Boghuma K TitanjiEmory University School of Medicine, 2015 Uppergate Dr, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emory University · USInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFProvidence College · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-036697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical trial participants have a right to be informed throughout the entire process of human subject research. As part of this pillar of research ethics, participants and other stakeholders should be made aware of research findings after a trial has been completed. Though participants have both a right, and a desire to be informed of research outcomes, studies show that they rarely receive communication about study findings. Our aim was (1) to understand what, if any, role communication plans play in current global health clinical research protocols and (2) to use our findings to develop a communication plan template tailored to clinical research carried out in low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC) while minimizing colonial assumptions. While the template was drafted in the LMIC context, the principles are universally applicable and should be considered best practices for all global health clinical trials.

methodsWe carried out a mixed-method study over a period of 6 months to understand the role of communication with study participants and other stakeholders in clinical trials. The semiquantitative analysis included mining publicly available clinical trial protocols for communication-related language. Qualitative interviews (n = 7) were used to gather knowledge and insight from clinical trial experts to inform the development of a communication plan template.

resultsNone of the 48 mined clinical trial protocols included a communication plan. Of the 48, 21% (n = 21) protocols included communication-related language, and 10% (n = 5) described plans to share trial results with participants.

conclusionThe use of communication plans in global health clinical trials is lacking. To our knowledge, this is the first in-depth analysis of communication plans in clinical trials to date. We recommend that researchers utilize the developed communication plan template throughout the entire research process to ensure a human-centered approach to participant communication. This communication plan should apply to all phases of a research trial, with a particular emphasis on plans to share results in an accessible and engaging manner once the trial has been completed.

Indexed as

CommunicationGlobal HealthAwarenessEthics, ResearchHumansLanguageClinical trialClinical trial participantCommunication planGlobal health

Identifiers

PMID36864516
PMCPMC9983505
OpenAlexW4322762838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.