Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864484›Full record

ReviewArthroplasty (London, England)2023

Single-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic joint infection after knee and hip arthroplasties: indications and treatments.

Wenbo Mu, Baochao Ji, Li Cao

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Partial versus full revision in cementless single-stage exchange for hip periprosthetic joint infection: a multicenter comparative study with 10-year survivorship analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. DACBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenbo MuDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830011, Xinjiang, China.
Baochao JiDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830011, Xinjiang, China.
Li CaoDepartment of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830011, Xinjiang, China. xjbone@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1580-7267
Xinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82260435The Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Natural Science Foundation of Youth Science Foundation 2021D01C331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic joint infection has been introduced 40 years ago. This option is gaining more and more attention as well as popularity. It is a reliable treatment for the chronic periprosthetic joint infection after knee and hip arthroplasties when implemented by an experienced multi-disciplinary team. However, its indications and corresponding treatments remain controversial. This review focused on the indications and specific treatments related to the option, with an attempt to help surgeons to use this method with more favorable outcomes.

Indexed as

ChronicIndicationPeriprosthetic joint infectionSingle-stage

Identifiers

PMID36864484
PMCPMC9979399
OpenAlexW4322774230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.