Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864482›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2023

Using strain-resolved analysis to identify contamination in metagenomics data.

Yue Clare Lou, Jordan Hoff, Matthew R Olm, Jacob West-Roberts, Spencer Diamond, Brian A Firek, Michael J Morowitz, Jillian F Banfield

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nationwide multicentre study of Nanopore long-read sequencing for 16S rRNA-species identification.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yue Clare LouDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jordan HoffDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Matthew R OlmDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jacob West-RobertsDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Spencer DiamondDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Brian A FirekDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Michael J MorowitzDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jillian F BanfieldDepartment of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. jbanfield@berkeley.edu.

Funding

Population Genomic Analysis of Gut Microbial Colonization in Premature InfantsR01AI092531 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Jillian Banfield, Michael Morowitz · 2011 to 2026
$11.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI092531NIH HHS RAI092531A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetagenomics analyses can be negatively impacted by DNA contamination. While external sources of contamination such as DNA extraction kits have been widely reported and investigated, contamination originating within the study itself remains underreported.

resultsHere, we applied high-resolution strain-resolved analyses to identify contamination in two large-scale clinical metagenomics datasets. By mapping strain sharing to DNA extraction plates, we identified well-to-well contamination in both negative controls and biological samples in one dataset. Such contamination is more likely to occur among samples that are on the same or adjacent columns or rows of the extraction plate than samples that are far apart. Our strain-resolved workflow also reveals the presence of externally derived contamination, primarily in the other dataset. Overall, in both datasets, contamination is more significant in samples with lower biomass.

conclusionOur work demonstrates that genome-resolved strain tracking, with its essentially genome-wide nucleotide-level resolution, can be used to detect contamination in sequencing-based microbiome studies. Our results underscore the value of strain-specific methods to detect contamination and the critical importance of looking for contamination beyond negative and positive controls. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsMicrobiotaBiomassDNADNA ContaminationDNAContaminationGenome-resolved metagenomicsMicrobiomeStrains

Identifiers

PMID36864482
PMCPMC9979413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.