Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864406›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Association of maternal risk factors with fetal aneuploidy and the accuracy of prenatal aneuploidy screening: a correlation analysis based on 12,186 karyotype reports.

Lun Wei, Jiakai Zhang, Ningxian Shi, Chao Luo, Le Bo, Xuanping Lu, Shasha Gao, Caiping Mao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lun Wei *Reproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No.899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, China.
Jiakai Zhang *Marxism Research Institute, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, Jiangsu, China.
Ningxian ShiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sihong County People's Hospital, Suqian, Jiangsu, China.
Chao LuoReproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No.899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, China.
Le BoReproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No.899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, China.
Xuanping LuReproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No.899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, China.
Shasha GaoReproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No.899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, China.
Caiping MaoReproductive Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No.899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu, China. maocaiping@suda.edu.cn.
First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNPeople's Hospital of Kaizhou District · CNSoochow University · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

Jiangsu Key Discipline of Human Assisted Reproduction Medicine Foundation FXK202149Jiangsu Key Discipline of Medicine Foundation of Commission of Health ZDB2020007National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671535National Science and Technology Support Program Project 2013BAI04B05Suzhou Major Project Research 20220901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNIPT is becoming increasingly important as its use becomes more widespread in China. More details are urgently needed on the correlation between maternal risk factors and fetal aneuploidy, and how these factors affect the accuracy of prenatal aneuploidy screening.

methodsInformation on the pregnant women was collected, including maternal age, gestational age, specific medical history and results of prenatal aneuploidy screening. Additionally, the OR, validity and predictive value were also calculated.

resultsA total of 12,186 analysable karyotype reports were collected with 372 (3.05%) fetal aneuploidies, including 161 (1.32%) T21, 81 (0.66%) T18, 41 (0.34%) T13 and 89 (0.73%) SCAs. The OR was highest for maternal age less than 20 years (6.65), followed by over 40 years (3.59) and 35-39 years (2.48). T13 (16.95) and T18 (9.40) were more frequent in the over-40 group (P < 0.01); T13 (3.62/5.76) and SCAs (2.49/3.95) in the 35-39 group (P < 0.01). Cases with a history of fetal malformation had the highest OR (35.94), followed by RSA (13.08): the former was more likely to have T13 (50.65) (P < 0.01) and the latter more likely to have T18 (20.50) (P < 0.01). The sensitivity of primary screening was 73.24% and the NPV was 98.23%. The TPR for NIPT was 100.00% and the respective PPVs for T21, T18, T13 and SCAs were 89.92, 69.77, 53.49 and 43.24%, respectively. The accuracy of NIPT increased with increasing gestational age (0.81). In contrast, the accuracy of NIPT decreased with maternal age (1.12) and IVF-ET history (4.15).

conclusions①Pregnant patients with maternal age below 20 years had higher risk of aneuploidy, especially in T13; ②A history of fetal malformations is more risky than RSA, with the former more likely to have T13 and the latter more likely to have T18; ③Primary screening essentially achieves the goal of identifying a normal karyotype, and NIPT can accurately screen for fetal aneuploidy; ④A number of maternal risk factors may influence the accuracy of NIPT diagnosis, including older age, premature testing, or a history of IVF-ET. In conclusion, this study provides a reliable theoretical basis for optimizing prenatal aneuploidy screening strategies and improving population quality.

Indexed as

Heart ArrestPrenatal CareAdultAneuploidyFemaleHumansKaryotypePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRisk FactorsYoung AdultAdolescent pregnancyFetal aneuploidyIVF-ETMaternal factorsNIPTPrenatal aneuploidy screening

Identifiers

PMID36864406
PMCPMC9979483
OpenAlexW4322770980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.