ArticleBMC neurology2023
Value of electrophysiological indicators in differential diagnosis of parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy.
Article in BMC neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms as an Indicator of Occult Neurologic Disease: A System-first Framework for Urologic Practice.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Applications of pelvic neurophysiology testing in clinical practice.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
- Case Report: Electrophysiological characteristics of the pelvic floor in spinal epidural lipomatosis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe evaluated the value of electrophysiological indicators by external anal sphincter electromyography (EAS-EMG), sympathetic skin response (SSR), R-R interval variation (RRIV), and Bulbocavernosus Reflex (BCR) in differential diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) and Parkinson's disease (PD).
methodsA total of 41 patients with MSA and 32 patients with PD were enrolled. The electrophysiological changes of autonomic dysfunction were assessed with BCR, EAS-EMG, SSR, and RRIV, and the abnormal rate of each indicator was calculated. The diagnostic value of each indicator was analyzed with ROC curve.
resultsThe incidence rate of autonomic dysfunction in MSA group was significantly higher than that in PD group (p < 0.05). The abnormal rates of BCR and EAS-EMG indicators in MSA group were higher than those in PD group (p < 0.05). The abnormal rates of SSR and RRIV indicators in MSA group and PD group were high; however, there was no significant difference between MSA and PD groups (p > 0.05). The sensitivity of BCR combined with EAS-EMG indicators in differential diagnosis of MSA and PD were 92.3% in males and 86.7% in females, respectively, and the specificity was 72.7% in males and 90% in females, respectively.
conclusionsCombined analysis of BCR and EAS-EMG has high sensitivity and specificity for differential diagnosis of MSA and PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.