Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864291›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2023

Treatment of lupus nephritis: consensus, evidence and perspectives.

Chi Chiu Mok, Y K Onno Teng, Ramesh Saxena, Yoshiya Tanaka

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
31.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06654024 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Urinary Congophilia as an Indicator of Disease Activity of Lupus Nephritis

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled74ConditionsLupus Nephritis (LN)
NCT07721857 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Dynamic Changes of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Lupus Nephritis and Their Role in Predicting Treatment Response.

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsLupus Nephritis (LN)ArmsSerum Neutrophil Extracellular Traps
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Chi Chiu MokDepartment of Medicine, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, China. ccmok2005@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-1228
Y K Onno TengCenter of Expertise for Lupus-, Vasculitis- and Complement-mediated systemic diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Ramesh SaxenaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5722-9509
Yoshiya TanakaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0807-7139
Leiden University Medical Center · NLSouthwestern Medical Center · USTuen Mun Hospital · CNUniversity of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the continuing development of immunomodulatory agents and supportive care, the prognosis associated with lupus nephritis (LN) has not improved substantially in the past decade, with end-stage kidney disease still developing in 5-30% of patients within 10 years of LN diagnosis. Moreover, inter-ethnic variation in the tolerance of, clinical response to and level of evidence regarding various therapeutic regimens for LN has led to variation in treatment prioritization in different international recommendations. Modalities that better preserve kidney function and reduce the toxicities of concomitant glucocorticoids are unmet needs in the development of therapeutics for LN. In addition to the conventional recommended therapies for LN, there are newly approved treatments as well as investigational drugs in the pipeline, including the newer generation calcineurin inhibitors and biologic agents. In view of the heterogeneity of LN in terms of clinical presentation and prognosis, the choice of therapies depends on a number of clinical considerations. Molecular profiling, gene-signature fingerprints and urine proteomic panels might enhance the accuracy of patient stratification for treatment personalization in the future.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicLupus NephritisHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsPrognosisProteomicsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID36864291
OpenAlexW4322774668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.