ArticleClinical oral investigations2023
Composite grafts made of polycaprolactone fiber mats and oil-based calcium phosphate cement pastes for the reconstruction of cranial and maxillofacial defects.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current State of Knowledge Regarding the Treatment of Cranial Bone Defects: An Overview.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Osteoclast-like multinucleated giant cells reinforce polycaprolactone grafts.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSynthetic bone substitutes which can be adapted preoperatively and patient specific may be helpful in various bony defects in the field of oral- and maxillofacial surgery. For this purpose, composite grafts made of self-setting and oil-based calcium phosphate cement (CPC) pastes, which were reinforced with 3D-printed polycaprolactone (PCL) fiber mats were manufactured. MATERIALS AND
methodsBone defect models were acquired using patient data from real defect situations of patients from our clinic. Using a mirror imaging technique, templates of the defect situation were fabricated via a commercially available 3D-printing system. The composite grafts were assembled layer by layer, aligned on top of these templates and fitted into the defect situation. Besides, PCL-reinforced CPC samples were evaluated regarding their structural and mechanical properties via X-ray diffraction (XRD), infrared (IR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and 3-point-bending testing.
resultsThe process sequence including data acquisition, template fabrication, and manufacturing of patient specific implants proved to be accurate and uncomplicated. The individual implants consisting mainly of hydroxyapatite and tetracalcium phosphate displayed good processability and a high precision of fit. The mechanical properties of the CPC cements in terms of maximum force and stress load to material fatigue were not negatively affected by the PCL fiber reinforcement, whereas clinical handling properties increased remarkably.
conclusionPCL fiber reinforcement of CPC cements enables the production of very freely modelable three-dimensional implants with adequate chemical and mechanical properties for bone replacement applications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The complex bone morphology in the region of the facial skull often poses a great challenge for a sufficient reconstruction of bony defects. A full-fledged bone replacement here often requires the replication of filigree three-dimensional structures partly without support from the surrounding tissue. With regard to this problem, the combination of smooth 3D-printed fiber mats and oil-based CPC pastes represents a promising method for fabricating patient specific degradable implants for the treatment of various craniofacial bone defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.