Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864266›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

"Everything in One Place": Stakeholder Perceptions of Integrated Medical and Social Care for Diabetes Patients in Western Maryland.

Loren Saulsberry, Kathryn E Gunter, Yolanda O'Neal, Jacob Tanumihardjo, Richard Gauthier, Marshall H Chin, Monica E Peek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Loren SaulsberryDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. lsaulsberry@uchicago.edu.
Kathryn E GunterSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yolanda O'NealSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jacob TanumihardjoSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Richard GauthierSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marshall H ChinSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Monica E PeekSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MILDA Renne SAUNDERS · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS NIDDK P30 DK092949NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with type 2 diabetes frequently have both medical- and health-related social needs that must be addressed for optimal disease management. Growing evidence suggests that intersectoral partnerships between health systems and community-based organizations may effectively support improved health outcomes for patients with diabetes.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to describe stakeholders' perceptions of the implementation factors associated with a diabetes management program, an intervention involving coordinated clinical and social services supports to address both medical- and health-related social needs. This intervention delivers proactive care alongside community partnerships, and leverages innovative financing mechanisms.

designQualitative study with semi-structured interviews.

participantsStudy participants included adults (18 years or older) who were patients with diabetes and essential staff (e.g., members of a diabetes care team, health care administrators) and leaders of community-based organizations. APPROACH: We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to develop a semi-structured interview guide designed to elicit perspectives from patients and essential staff on their experiences within an outpatient center to support patients with chronic conditions (the CCR) as a part of an intervention to improve care for patients with diabetes. KEY

resultsInterviews illuminated three key takeaways: (1) team-based care held an important role in promoting accountability across stakeholders motivating patient engagement and positive perceptions, (2) mission-driven alignment across the health care and community sectors was needed to synergize a broad range of efforts, and (3) global payment models allowing for flexible resource allocation can invaluably support the appropriate care being directed where it is needed the most whether medical or social services.

conclusionsThe views and experiences of patient and essential staff stakeholder groups reported here thematically according to CFIR domains may inform the development of other chronic disease interventions that address medical- and health-related social needs in additional settings.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultDelivery of Health CareHumansMarylandQualitative ResearchSocial SupportDiabetesQualitative researchSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID36864266
PMCPMC10043057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.