Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36864170›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Analysis of contact pressure in a 3D model of dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis under a gait cycle.

Mohammad Tauviqirrahman, Muhammad Imam Ammarullah, J Jamari, Eko Saputra, Tri Indah Winarni, Febri Dwi Kurniawan, Shidnan Amir Shiddiq, Emile van der Heide

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad TauviqirrahmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Central Java, Indonesia. mohammad.tauviqirrahman@ft.undip.ac.id.
Muhammad Imam AmmarullahDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pasundan University, Bandung, 40153, West Java, Indonesia.
J JamariDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Central Java, Indonesia.
Eko SaputraDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Semarang State Polytechnic, Semarang, 50275, Central Java, Indonesia.
Tri Indah WinarniUndip Biomechanics Engineering and Research Centre (UBM-ERC), Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Central Java, Indonesia.
Febri Dwi KurniawanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Central Java, Indonesia.
Shidnan Amir ShiddiqDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Central Java, Indonesia.
Emile van der HeideDepartment of Mechanics of Solids, Surfaces and Systems (MS3), Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, Postbox 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Diponegoro University · IDPoliteknik Negeri SemarangUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip joint prostheses are used to replace hip joint function in the human body. The latest dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis has an additional component of an outer liner that acts as a cover for the liner component. Research on the contact pressure generated on the latest model of a dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis under a gait cycle has never been done before. The model is made of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) on the inner liner and 316L stainless steel (SS 316L) on the outer liner and acetabular cup. Simulation modeling using the finite element method is considered static loading with an implicit solver for studying the geometric parameter design of dual-mobility hip joint prostheses. In this study, simulation modeling was carried out by applying varying inclination angles of 30°, 40°, 45°, 50°, 60°, and 70° to the acetabular cup component. Three-dimensional loads were placed on femoral head reference points with variations of femoral head diameter used at 22 mm, 28 mm, and 32 mm. The results in the inner surface of the inner liner, the outer surface of the outer liner, and the inner surface of the acetabular cup showed that the variations in inclination angle do not have a major effect on the maximum contact pressure value on the liner component, where the acetabular cup with an inclination angle of 45° can reduce contact pressure more than the other studied inclination angle variations. In addition, it was found that the 22 mm diameter of the femoral head increases the contact pressure. The use of a larger diameter femoral head with an acetabular cup configuration at a 45° inclination can minimize the risk of implant failure due to wear.

Indexed as

AcetabulumHip ProsthesisComputer SimulationFemur HeadGaitHumans

Identifiers

PMID36864170
PMCPMC9981612
OpenAlexW4322767250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.