ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023
Single-institution experience of 500 pulmonary resections guided by intraoperative molecular imaging.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Phase 2 Multicenter Clinical Trial of Intraoperative Molecular Imaging of Lung Cancer with a pH-Activatable Nanoprobe.Molecular imaging and biology · 2024Trial
- Intraoperative Molecular Imaging in Thoracic Oncology: Expanding the Observable Disease Space.Cancers · 2026Review
- Precision at the Margin: Innovations and Challenges in Intraoperative Molecular Imaging for Thoracic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Surgical impact of pafolacianine-based intraoperative molecular imaging in lobar versus sublobar pulmonary resection.JTCVS techniques · 2025Article
- Current Status and Future Perspectives of Preoperative and Intraoperative Marking in Thoracic Surgery.Cancers · 2024Review
- A pH-Activatable Nanoprobe Labels Diverse Histologic Subtypes of Human Lung Cancer During Resection.Molecular imaging and biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIntraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) using tumor-targeted optical contrast agents can improve thoracic cancer resections. There are no large-scale studies to guide surgeons in patient selection or imaging agent choice. Here, we report our institutional experience with IMI for lung and pleural tumor resection in 500 patients over a decade.
methodsBetween December 2011 and November 2021, patients with lung or pleural nodules undergoing resection were preoperatively infused with 1 of 4 optical contrast tracers: EC17, TumorGlow, pafolacianine, or SGM-101. Then, during resection, IMI was used to identify pulmonary nodules, confirm margins, and identify synchronous lesions. We retrospectively reviewed patient demographic data, lesion diagnoses, and IMI tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs).
resultsFive hundred patients underwent resection of 677 lesions. We found that there were 4 types of clinical utility of IMI: detection of positive margins (n = 32, 6.4% of patients), identification of residual disease after resection (n = 37, 7.4%), detection of synchronous cancers not predicted on preoperative imaging (n = 26, 5.2%), and minimally invasive localization of nonpalpable lesions (n = 101 lesions, 14.9%). Pafolacianine was most effective for adenocarcinoma-spectrum malignancies (mean TBR, 2.84), and TumorGlow was most effective for metastatic disease and mesothelioma (TBR, 3.1). False-negative fluorescence was primarily seen in mucinous adenocarcinomas (mean TBR, 1.8), heavy smokers (>30 pack years; TBR, 1.9), and tumors greater than 2.0 cm from the pleural surface (TBR, 1.3).
conclusionsIMI may be effective in improving resection of lung and pleural tumors. The choice of IMI tracer should vary by the surgical indication and the primary clinical challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.