Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36863736›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Can youth-engaged research facilitate equitable access to contraception in Canada? The qualitative study protocol for the Ask Us project.

Sarah Munro, Giuseppina Di Meglio, Aleyah Williams, Skye Pamela Barbic, Stephanie Begun, Amanda Black, Andrea Carson, Michelle Fortin, Kaiya Jacob, Zeba Khan and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "I liked having my voice heard:" a feasible, rapid approach for codesigning a contraceptive counseling curriculum.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sarah MunroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada sarah.munro@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3884-6592
Giuseppina Di MeglioMontreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Aleyah WilliamsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Skye Pamela BarbicOccupational Science and Occupational Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Stephanie BegunFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amanda BlackDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea CarsonResearch, Innovation, and Discovery, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Michelle FortinOptions for Sexual Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kaiya JacobYouth Partner, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Zeba KhanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ruth Martin-MisenerSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Salima MeheraliFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-8600
Victoria PallerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hajar SeiyadYouth Partner, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carol-Anne ValléeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kate WahlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7921-6191
Wendy V NormanDepartment of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-7882

Funding

CIHR 180633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is little to no evidence in Canada on the barriers that youth face when accessing contraception. We seek to identify the contraception access, experiences, beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and needs of youth in Canada, from the perspectives of youth and youth service providers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective, mixed-methods, integrated knowledge mobilisation study, the Ask Us project, will involve a national sample of youth, healthcare and social service providers, and policy makers recruited via a novel relational mapping and outreach approach led by youth. Phase I will centre the voices of youth and their service providers through in-depth one-on-one interviews. We will explore the factors influencing youth access to contraception, theoretically guided by Levesque's Access to Care framework. Phase II will focus on the cocreation and evaluation of knowledge translation products (youth stories) with youth, service providers, and policy makers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was received from the University of British Columbia's Research Ethics Board (H21-01091). Full open-access publication of the work will be sought in an international peer-reviewed journal. Findings will be disseminated to youth and service providers through social media, newsletters, and communities of practice, and to policy makers through invited evidence briefs and face-to-face presentations.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelContraceptionAdolescentCanadaEthics, ResearchHumansProspective StudiesCommunity child healthGYNAECOLOGYHealth policyQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID36863736
PMCPMC9990688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.