Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36863714›Full record

ArticleThe journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians2023

An evaluation of implementation climate in inpatient maternity care: a cross-sectional survey study.

Rebecca F Hamm, Lisa D Levine, Elizabeth Quigley, Rinad S Beidas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca F HammDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lisa D LevineDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elizabeth QuigleyDepartment of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rinad S BeidasLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

A standardized labor induction protocol to reduce primary cesarean and racial disparities in labor outcomes: a prospective cohort studyK23HD102523 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HAMM, REBECCA FELDMAN · 2020 to 2023
$680k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD102523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearchers in obstetrics and gynecology are continuously generating new evidence to inform clinical care delivery. Yet, much of this newly emerging evidence fails to be rapidly and effectively integrated into routine clinical practice. Implementation climate refers to clinicians' perceptions of to what degree organizations support and reward use of an evidence-based practice (EBP) and is an important construct in the science of implementation in healthcare. Little is known about implementation climate for EBPs in maternity care. Thus, we aimed to (a) determine the reliability of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS) for use in inpatient maternity care, (b) describe implementation climate in inpatient maternity care overall, and (c) compare individual perceptions of implementation climate between physician and nursing clinicians on these units. STUDY

designWe performed a cross-sectional survey of clinicians in inpatient maternity units across 2 urban, academic hospitals in the northeastern United States in 2020. Clinicians completed the 18-question validated ICS [scored 0-4]. Scale reliability by role was evaluated using Cronbach's

results111 clinicians completed the survey (physicians = 65; nursing = 46). Physicians were less likely to identify as female (75.4% vs. 100.0%,

conclusionsThis study supports the ICS as a reliable scale for measuring implementation climate in the inpatient maternity care setting. Notably lower implementation climate scores across subscales and roles compared to other settings may underlie the vast evidence to practice gap in obstetrics. In order to successfully implement practices that reduce maternal morbidity, we may need to focus on building educational support and rewarding EBP utilization on labor and delivery units, with an emphasis on nursing clinicians.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesObstetricsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInpatientsPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsEvidence-based practicesimplementation climateimplementation climate scalematernity care

Identifiers

PMID36863714
PMCPMC10207965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.